SPMI Speedmissions Inc (CE)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

June 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

 

Note 1. Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Speedemissions, Inc. (referred to herein as “Speedemissions” and the “Company”) have been prepared on a going concern basis which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue as a going concern.

Speedemissions has experienced recurring net losses which have caused an accumulated deficit of $21,867,441 at June 30, 2017. We had a working capital deficit of $1,201,138 at June 30, 2017 compared to a working capital deficit of $1,599,535 at December 31, 2016.

Our revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 have been insufficient to attain repeatable profitable operations and to provide adequate levels of cash flow from operations. While the Company reported net income of $160,185 for the six months ended June 30, 2017, our profit included two non-recurring items. These non-recurring items were a gain of $199,910 from derecognition of accounts payable and a gain of $75,058 from disposal of non-strategic assets. Without these two non-recurring gains, we would have reported a net loss of $114,783 for the six months ended June 30, 2017. Our near term liquidity and ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on our ability to generate sufficient revenues from our station operations to provide sufficient cash flow from operations to pay our current level of operating expenses, provide for inventory purchases and to reduce past due amounts owed to vendors and service providers. No assurances can be given that the Company will be able to achieve sufficient levels of revenues in the near term to provide adequate levels of cash flow from operations. Should an increase in revenues not materialize, we will seek to further reduce operating costs to bring them in line with reduced revenue levels. If the Company is unable to achieve near term profitability and generate sufficient cash flow from operations, and if the Company is unable to sufficiently reduce operating costs, we would need to raise additional capital or obtain additional borrowings beyond our existing credit facilities. We currently have very limited access to capital, including the public and private placement of equity securities and additional debt financing. No assurances can be given that additional capital or borrowings would be available or, if available, that we would be able to complete a capital raise or financing on satisfactory terms, to allow us to continue as a going concern. As a result of the Company’s history of losses and financial condition, there is substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern. If the Company is unable to continue as a going concern, our shareholders will likely lose all of their investment in the Company.

We have been unable to make all required payments to the federal government for payroll taxes withheld from employee paychecks and the associated matching employer payroll taxes from April 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 and for November and December of 2016.   As of August 4, 2017, we owed approximately $309,000, including penalties and interest assessed through December 31, 2016, for the previously described payroll tax obligations to the federal government.   We proposed a payment plan to the federal government and made payments totaling approximately $87,000 from September 30, 2015 through June 30, 2017, but we have not reached an agreed payment schedule for the remainder of our federal payroll tax obligations as of the date of this report. We made all federal tax deposits for 2017 payroll periods through June 30, 2017, however have been unable to make federal tax deposits for two payrolls paid in July 2017 and consequently owe federal employment taxes of approximately $25,100 as of August 4, 2017.

On April 16, 2015, the Company entered into a revolving loan agreement with Celtic Bank (“CB”), pursuant to which the Company initially borrowed $17,000 from CB.  Under the terms of the revolving loan agreement, the Company agreed to repay the initial loan, plus interest, for a total amount of $18,955 by October 15, 2015.  The Company made the required six monthly payments by the October 15, 2015 due date.  At their sole discretion, CB can increase the maximum availability under the revolving loan agreement above the $17,000 amount established upon the execution of the revolving loan agreement and, effective April 18, 2016, CB increased our borrowing limit to $33,200.  At August 4, 2017, the outstanding balance on our revolving loan facility with CB was approximately $22,000 and our cash balances were approximately $1,000.

Our revenues during the years ended December 2016 and 2015, as well as the six months ended June 30, 2017, have been insufficient to attain sustainable profitable operations and to provide adequate levels of cash flow from operations. While the Company reported net income of $160,185 for the six months ended June 30, 2017, our profit included two non-recurring items. These non-recurring items were a gain of $199,910 from derecognition of accounts payable and a gain of $75,058 from disposal of non-strategic assets. Without these two non-recurring gains, we would have reported a net loss of $114,783 for the six months ended June 30, 2017. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 and the six months ended June 30, 2017, due to insufficient cash flow from operations and borrowing limitations under our line of credit facility, we have been extending payments owed to landlords and vendors beyond normal payment terms and deadlines. Until such vendors are paid within normal payment terms, no assurances can be given that required services and materials needed to support operations will continue to be provided. In addition, no assurances can be given that vendors will not pursue legal means to collect past due balances owed. Any interruption of services or materials would likely have an adverse impact on our operations and could impact our ability to continue as a going concern.

 

Note 2: Nature of Operations

 

Description of Business

     

The Company classifies its business into two separate operating segments. The primary segment consists of the Company’s 21 vehicle emissions testing stations operating under the trade names of Speedemissions and Auto Emissions Express (in Atlanta, Georgia and St. Louis, Missouri), plus three mobile testing units in the Atlanta, Georgia area which service automotive dealerships and local government agencies. During the quarter ended June 30, 2017, the Company started an auto recycling business operation with one location in Montgomery, Alabama. The auto recycling segment operates under the trade name Auto Recycling of Montgomery and purchases used vehicles to disassemble into component parts and sell on the wholesale and retail markets.

Our vehicle emissions testing stations use computerized emissions testing that test vehicles for compliance with vehicle emissions standards. We purchase or lease these computerized testing systems from state approved equipment vendors. Our revenues are mainly generated from the testing or inspection fees charged to the registered owner of the vehicle. As a service to our customers, we also sell automotive parts and supplies such as windshield wipers, taillight bulbs and gas caps at our St. Louis, Missouri location. However, we do not provide automotive repair services.

Our auto recycling location purchases used and damaged automotive vehicles, which it disassembles into their component parts. Our revenues are primarily generated from the subsequent sale of these disassembled parts to both wholesale and retail customers via local and internet-based sales operations.

On June 22, 2010, the Company announced the launch of its first iPhone application, Carbonga . Carbonga diagnosed an automobile’s computer system using the on board diagnostic port available on vehicles produced since 1996. Carbonga could check over 2,000 vehicle fault codes. We launched version two of Carbonga on February 16, 2011. Version two improved the speed and performance of the application and added additional features, including the ability to receive vehicle safety recalls and Technical Service Bulletins (“TSB”), for an annual subscription fee.  On November 20, 2013, Carbonga received several upgrades and was re-introduced as Carbonga-SRI in the Apple® app store for a one-time fee of $4.99. Product enhancements now have safety and TSB information up to the current model year and for the past 20 years as well. In addition, there is an upgraded “push notification” feature and an easier to use “add/delete” section. With the introduction of Carbonga-SRI, the Carbonga app was subsequently discontinued and turned-off in the app store .

During the quarter ended September 30, 2012, we formed a new company, SpeedEmissions Car Care, LLC, through which we franchised our vehicle emissions and safety inspections station model. Franchises are available to qualified station operators who have an interest in either a single- or multi-location opportunity in select cities where vehicle emissions testing/safety inspections and other automotive services are required. We signed an agreement with an Atlanta based franchise consulting company to assist with our plan to franchise our business model into a number of new U.S. markets. After securing approval for all the necessary disclosure documents, we began marketing franchises in the fourth quarter of 2012.  However, as of June 30, 2017, we have sold no franchises.

On December 5, 2014, we sold the assets comprising five of our six Salt Lake City, Utah stations for $1,350,000 in cash.

On March 10, 2017, we closed our Salt Lake City, Utah, station under a lease termination agreement with the landlord.  As compensation for the early termination of the station’s lease, the Company received a cash payment of $250,000 on March 20, 2017. As a result, we now operate 21 emission testing centers in Atlanta, Georgia and St. Louis, Missouri metropolitan areas, plus three mobile testing units in the Atlanta, Georgia area.

On March 20, 2017, the Company entered into and closed an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Auto Recycling of Montgomery, Inc., an Alabama corporation (“ARM”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to purchase certain assets of ARM, including land, buildings, equipment and inventory previously used by ARM in an auto recycling operation which ceased operations in June of 2014.  The purchase price was $175,000 for the land and buildings and $90,000 for the equipment and inventory.  The Company incurred $28,300 in expenses for professional services rendered in the identification of the purchased assets and closing of the Purchase Agreement. The Company entered into two separate note agreements with ARM to fund the purchase of the assets.  Terms of each note included an interest rate of ten percent, an amortization term of ten years and a seven year balloon payment.  Monthly payments for the $175,000 land and buildings note and for the $90,000 equipment and inventory note commenced on July 20, 2017 in the amounts of $2,313 and $1,189, respectively.  Using the acquired assets, the Company created an auto recycling business operation, hiring one employee, organizing business assets and commencing limited sales operations during the quarter ended June 30, 2017.

 

 

Basis of Presentation

    

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) as codified in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments consisting of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of its financial position and results of operations. Interim results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be achieved for the full year. The financial statements and related notes do not include all information and footnotes required by GAAP for annual reports. This quarterly report should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date of the filing its Form 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company is not aware of any significant events that occurred subsequent to the balance sheet date but prior to the filing of this report that would have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Speedemissions and its non-operating subsidiaries, which are 100% owned by the Company. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company classifies its business into two separate operating segments.  The primary segment consists of the Company’s 21 vehicle emissions testing stations operating under the trade names of Speedemissions and Auto Emissions Express (in Atlanta, Georgia and St. Louis, Missouri), plus three mobile testing units in the Atlanta, Georgia area which service automotive dealerships and local government agencies.  In addition, during the quarter ended June 30, 2017, the Company started an auto recycling business operation with one location in Montgomery, Alabama, as previously discussed.  The auto recycling segment operates under the trade name Auto Recycling of Montgomery and purchases used vehicles which it disassembles into component parts and sells on the wholesale and retail markets.  

 

Note 3: Significant Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Significant estimates included in these financial statements relate to useful lives of property and equipment, the valuation allowance provided against deferred tax assets and the valuation of long-lived assets and goodwill. Actual results could differ from those estimates. For a description of Speedemissions’ critical accounting policies see the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The carrying amounts of cash, other current assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair value because of the short-term nature of these accounts. Fair value of the equipment financing agreements and capital lease obligations approximate carrying value based upon current borrowing rates. The fair value of the Company’s note receivable and note payable also approximates the carrying value because outstanding balances can be repaid at any time.

Note 4: Inventory

 

Inventory at June 30, 2017 consisted of automobile parts, certificate and merchandise inventory and was $50,835, $7,090 and $765, respectively. Inventory at December 31, 2016 consisted of certificate and merchandise inventory and was $7,766 and $1,352, respectively.

 

Note 5: Notes Receivable

   

On September 14, 2010, the Company settled a lawsuit originally filed in 2006 against a former manager. The Company alleged the manager, while employed by the Company, breached his fiduciary duty by purchasing property in Texas where one of the Company’s testing facilities he managed was located. Under the provisions of the settlement agreement, the Company was to receive a sum of $125,000 payable in monthly installments of $1,000 per month for 72 months. The balance of $53,000 was due and payable to the Company on June 1, 2016. The Company recognized a gain from the legal settlement in the amount of $106,881 during 2010.  On May 6, 2016, in consideration of a payment of $47,000, the Company agreed to cancel the note as paid in full, recording a loss of $6,000.

 

 

During 2015, we sold equipment for $2,000 in cash plus a note receivable of $2,496.  The principal amount of the note was payable in equal monthly payments over a 12-month period with no interest. The note was paid in full in January 2016.

There was no outstanding balance of notes receivable as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

 

  

   

  Note 8: Notes Payable

   

Bridge Note Agreement

On November 11, 2010, the Company entered into a $55,000 bridge note agreement (the “Note”) with an affiliate, GCA Strategic Investment Fund, Limited (“GCA”). The funds received from the Note were used for general working capital purposes. The Note bore 0% interest and was due in full on November 11, 2012. The Note is subject to mandatory prepayment upon a change of control, as defined in the Note. In consideration for the receipt of the Note, the Company issued GCA 4,000,000 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock at $0.50 per share.  On April 15, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company and GCA agreed to amend GCA’s 4,000,000 warrants whereby the exercise price of the warrants would be reduced to $0.016 from $0.50. The closing price of the Company’s common stock was $0.013 on April 14, 2011.  The warrants were exercised on April 18, 2011 at the reduced exercise price of $0.016 per share. The Note has been extended annually since the first renewal date.  The most recent renewal of the Note was on November 6, 2016, establishing a new maturity date of November 6, 2017. The Note had a balance due of $60,000 on June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

Secured Note Agreements

On March 20, 2017, the Company entered into and closed the Purchase Agreement with ARM, pursuant to which the Company agreed to purchase certain assets of ARM, including land, buildings, equipment and inventory previously used by ARM in an auto recycling operation which ceased operations in June of 2014.  The purchase price was $175,000 for the land and buildings and $90,000 for the equipment and inventory.  The Company incurred $28,300 in expenses for professional services rendered in the identification of the purchased assets and closing of the Purchase Agreement. The Company entered into two separate note agreements with ARM to fund the purchase of the assets.  Terms of each note included an interest rate of ten percent, an amortization term of ten years and a seven year balloon payment.  Monthly payments for the $175,000 land and buildings note and for the $90,000 equipment and inventory note commenced on July 20, 2017 in the amounts of $2,313 and $1,189, respectively. Using the acquired assets, the Company created an auto recycling business operation, which commenced operations during the quarter ended June 30, 2017. The secured notes had a balance due of $265,000 and $0 as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. 

 

 

Promissory Note Agreements

On November 5, 2014, the Company entered into a promissory note agreement with Dianna Parlontieri, wife of the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to which Mrs. Parlontieri loaned the Company $20,000 for working capital purposes. Under the terms of the promissory note, the Company agreed to repay the loan, plus interest, for a total amount of $20,400 by December 15, 2014.  Because the Company did not repay the loan in full by December 15, 2014, the Company is required to repay $1,700 on the 15th of each month, starting December 15, 2014, until the loan is re-paid in full.  If any of the monthly payments are not paid on the respective due date then the monthly payment amount is subject to a default interest rate of 10% per annum.  The Company is currently in default of the terms of this promissory note as it did not make the required repayment on December 15, 2014 and has not made any of the required monthly payments as of the date of this report.   The Note had principal due of $20,000 on June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

Daily Payment Note Agreements

On June 8, 2015, the Company entered into a revenue-based factoring agreement with Samson Partners, LLC (“SP”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to repay SP $250,000 from a loan made by SP to the Company, plus a fixed fee which the Company will record as interest expense, for a total repayment amount of $337,500 by April 14, 2016.  Under the terms of the agreement, SP is authorized to make daily bank debits of $1,600 on each available banking day during the term of the agreement which represents a fee rate of 34.8%.  The Company repaid the remaining balance on January 8, 2016 and, as a result, there was no outstanding balance as of June 30, 2017 or December 31, 2016.

On October 12, 2015, the Company entered into another revenue-based factoring agreement with SP, pursuant to which the Company agreed to repay SP $75,000 from a loan made by SP to the Company, plus a fixed fee which the Company will record as interest expense, for a total repayment amount of $101,250 by August 22, 2016. The Company repaid the balance of the loan on May 31, 2016 and, as a result, there was no outstanding balance as of June 30, 2017 or December 31, 2016.

On January 5, 2016, the Company entered into another revenue-based factoring agreement with SP, pursuant to which the Company agreed to repay SP $235,000 from a loan made by SP to the Company, plus a fixed fee which the Company will record as interest expense, for a total repayment amount of $321,950 by January 10, 2017.  A portion of the proceeds were used to pay off the June 8, 2015 SP revenue-based factoring agreement described above.  The Company repaid the balance of the loan on September 23, 2016 and, as a result, there was no outstanding balance as of June 30, 2017 or December 31, 2016.

On May 26, 2016, the Company entered into another revenue-based factoring agreement with SP, pursuant to which the Company agreed to repay SP $200,000 from a loan made by SP to the Company, plus a fixed fee which the Company will record as interest expense, for a total repayment amount of $260,000 by May 31, 2017.  A portion of the proceeds were used to pay off the October 12, 2015 SP revenue-based factoring agreement described above. Under the terms of the agreement, SP is authorized to make daily bank debits of $1,035 on each available banking day during the term of the agreement which represents a fee rate of 30.0%. The Company repaid the balance of the loan on December 27, 2016 and, as a result, there was no outstanding balance as of June 30, 2017 or December 31, 2016.

On September 16, 2016, the Company entered into another revenue-based factoring agreement with SP, pursuant to which the Company agreed to repay SP $200,000 from a loan made by SP to the Company, plus a fixed fee which the Company will record as interest expense, for a total repayment amount of $270,000 by September 10, 2017.  A portion of the proceeds were used to pay off the January 5, 2016 SP revenue-based factoring agreement described above. Under the terms of the agreement, SP is authorized to make daily bank debits of $1,097 on each available banking day during the term of the agreement which represents a fee rate of 35.0%. The agreement had a balance due of $44,795 and $147,182 as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

On December 19, 2016, the Company entered into another revenue-based factoring agreement with SP, pursuant to which the Company agreed to repay SP $225,000 from a loan made by SP to the Company, plus a fixed fee which the Company will record as interest expense, for a total repayment amount of $290,250 by December 12, 2017.  A portion of the proceeds were used to pay off the May 26, 2016 SP revenue-based factoring agreement described above. Under the terms of the agreement, SP is authorized to make daily bank debits of $1,180 on each available banking day during the term of the agreement which represents a fee rate of 29.0%. The agreement had a balance due of $121,178 and $222,255 as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

Revolving Credit Facility

On April 16, 2015, the Company entered into a revolving loan agreement with CB, pursuant to which the Company initially borrowed $17,000 from CB.  Under the terms of the revolving loan agreement, the Company agreed to repay the initial loan, plus interest, for a total amount of $18,955 by October 15, 2015.  The Company made the required six monthly payments by the October 15, 2015 due date.  At their sole discretion, CB can increase the maximum availability under the revolving loan agreement above the $17,000 amount established upon the execution of the revolving loan agreement and, effective April 18, 2016, CB increased our borrowing limit to $33,200.  At August 4, 2017, the outstanding balance on our revolving loan facility with CB was approximately $22,000 and our cash balances were approximately $1,000.  The revolving loan agreement had a balance due of $27,297 and $26,367 as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. 

 

Note 9: Net Loss Per Share

   

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) or net income (loss) per share represents net income (loss) divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during a reported period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock, including stock options, warrants, and contingently issuable shares such as the Company’s Series A and Series B preferred stock (commonly and hereinafter referred to as “Common Stock Equivalents”), were exercised or converted into common stock.

   

The following table sets forth the computation for basic and diluted net income (loss) per share for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively:

 

(1)

The Company reported net income for the six month period ended June 30, 2017.  However, aggregate Common Stock Equivalents of 378,000 issuable under stock options and warrants that were potentially dilutive securities are anti-dilutive because the exercise prices for both the stock options and warrants exceeded the closing price of $0.004 for the Company’s common stock as of June 30, 2017 and, therefore, have been excluded from the computation of weighted average common shares (diluted) for the six month period ended June 30, 2017. As a result of the Company’s net loss for the three month period ended June 30, 2017 and the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016, aggregate Common Stock Equivalents of, respectively,  378,000 and 426,000 issuable under stock options and warrants that were potentially dilutive securities are anti-dilutive and have been excluded from the computation of weighted average common shares (diluted) for the three month period ended June 30, 2017 and the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2016, respectively. These Common Stock Equivalents could be dilutive in future periods.

(2)

The Company reported net income for six month period ended June 30, 2017. However, aggregate Common Stock Equivalents of 4,277,498 issuable under Series A convertible, redeemable preferred stock that were potentially dilutive securities are anti-dilutive because the exercise prices for the Series A convertible, redeemable preferred stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) exceeded the closing price of $0.004 for the Company’s common stock as of June 30, 2017 and, therefore, have been excluded from the computation of weighted average common shares (diluted) for the six month period ended June 30, 2017. As a result of the Company’s net loss for the three month period ended June 30, 2017 and the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016, aggregate Common Stock Equivalents of 4,277,498 issuable under Series A Preferred Stock that were potentially dilutive securities are anti-dilutive and have been excluded from the computation of weighted average common shares diluted for the three month period ended June 30, 2017 and the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016. These Common Stock Equivalents could be dilutive in future periods.

 

Note 10: Preferred and Common Stock

 

Preferred Stock

    

There were 5,133 shares of Series A Preferred Stock issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. For financial statement purposes, the Series A Preferred Stock has been presented outside of stockholders’ deficit on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as a result of certain conditions that are outside the control of the Company that could trigger redemption of the securities.

 

 

Common Stock

   

The Company issued no   common shares during the six month period ended June 30, 2017.  The Company had 118,364,225 common shares outstanding as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

 

Note 11: Share-Based Compensation

 

The Company has several share-based compensation plans under which employees and non-employee directors receive stock options. Additionally, the Company has issued shares of its common stock as compensation to employees and payments of services rendered by third parties.  Share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the calculated fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the employee’s requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the equity grant). Fair value of the award is calculated using the Black-Scholes model or based on the fair value of the shares issued for the services provided, whichever is more accurately determinable. Such value is recognized as an expense over the requisite service period, net of estimated forfeitures, using the straight-line attribution method. The estimate of awards that will ultimately vest requires significant judgment, and to the extent actual results or updated estimates differ from the Company’s current estimates, such amounts are recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period estimates are revised. The Company considers many factors when estimating expected forfeitures, including types of awards, employee class and historical employee attrition rates. Actual results, and future changes in estimates, may differ substantially from the Company’s current estimates.

There was no share based compensation expense during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016. Share-based compensation is included in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.

 

Stock Incentive Plans

   

The Company has granted options to employees and directors to purchase the Company’s common stock under various stock incentive plans. Under the plans, employees and non-employee directors are eligible to receive awards of various forms of equity-based incentive compensation, including stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance awards, among others. The plans are administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, which determines the terms of the awards granted. Stock options are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant, have a term of ten years or less, and generally vest over three years from the date of grant.

  

The following table sets forth options outstanding under the Company’s stock option plans during the six month period ended June 30, 2017.  The Company did not grant stock options in the six months ended June 30, 2017. 

    

The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2017 was $0. Intrinsic value is the amount by which the fair value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the options.

The Company estimates the fair value for stock options at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which requires management to make certain assumptions. Expected volatility is based on comparable company data. The Company bases the risk-free interest rate on U.S. Treasury note rates. The expected term is based on the vesting period and an expected exercise term. The Company does not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future and therefore uses an expected dividend yield of 0%.

As of June 30, 2017, there was no unrecognized share-based compensation expense related to non-vested stock options. There were no options that vested during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

There were 6,000 options issued and outstanding under the Company’s 2001 Stock Option Plan, the Amended and Restated 2005 Omnibus Stock Grant and Option Plan, Speedemissions Inc. 2006 Stock Grant and Option Plan and the 2008 Stock Grant and Option Plan (collectively, the “Option Plans”) as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. There were no options granted under these plans during the six month period ended June 30, 2017. There were no options exercised during the six month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

 

 

Stock Warrants

  

There were 372,000 common stock warrants outstanding as of June 30, 2017, and there were no warrants granted or exercised during the six month period ended June 30, 2017.

 

Note 12: Income Taxes

 

No provision for income taxes has been reflected for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, as the Company has sufficient net operating loss carry forwards to offset taxable income.

 

  Note 13: Contingencies

 

From time to time, the Company may be involved in claims that arise out of the normal course of its business. In the opinion of management, we are not currently involved in any legal proceedings which would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Note 14: Segment Information

 

The Company classifies its business into two separate operating segments based on their separate and distinct operating activities.  The primary segment consists of the Company’s 21 vehicle emissions testing stations operating under the trade names of Speedemissions and Auto Emissions Express (in Atlanta, Georgia and St. Louis, Missouri), plus three mobile testing units in the Atlanta, Georgia area which service automotive dealerships and local government agencies.  During the quarter ended June 30, 2017, the Company started an auto recycling business operation with one location in Montgomery, Alabama, as previously discussed.  The auto recycling segment operates under the trade name Auto Recycling of Montgomery and purchases used vehicles which it disassembles into component parts and sells on the wholesale and retail markets.

The following table provides segment level financial information: