NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
July 31, 2017
NOTE 1 – DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Gawk Incorporated (“we”, “our”, the “Company”) was incorporated in the state of Nevada on January 6, 2011 with principal business address at 5300 Melrose Avenue, Suite 42, Los Angeles, CA. The Company offers a suite of cloud communications, cloud connectivity, cloud computing, and managed cloud-based applications solutions to small, medium, and large businesses; and offers domestic and international voice services to communications carriers worldwide. It offers a suite of advanced data center and cloud-based services managed network services that converge voice and data applications.
NOTE 2 – GOING CONCERN
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. However, the Company has a deficiency in equity of $24,602,031, a working capital deficit of $8,767,699, and an accumulated deficit of $28,928,805.
These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. The Company’s continued existence is dependent upon management’s ability to develop profitable operations, continued contributions from the Company’s executive officers to finance its operations and the ability to obtain additional funding sources to explore potential strategic relationships and to provide capital and other resources for the further development and marketing of the Company’s products and business.
NOTE 3 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation of Interim Financial Statements
The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the six months ended July 31, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending January 31, 2018. Notes to the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements that would substantially duplicate the disclosures contained in the audited consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2017 have been omitted. This report should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the footnotes thereto for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2017 included in the Company’s Form 10-K/A as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 24, 2017.
Use of Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect (i) the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, (ii) the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities known to exist as of the date the financial statements are published, and (iii) the reported amount of net revenues and expenses recognized during the periods presented. Adjustments made with respect to the use of estimates often relate to improved information not previously available. Uncertainties with respect to such estimates and assumptions are inherent in the preparation of financial statements; accordingly, actual results could differ from these estimates.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. We currently have no investments accounted for using the equity or cost methods of accounting.
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.
Revenue Recognition
The Company pursues opportunities to realize revenues from consulting services. It is the company’s policy that revenues and gains will be recognized in accordance with ASC Topic 605-10-25, “Revenue Recognition.” Under ASC Topic 605-10-25, revenue earning activities are recognized when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.
Our Business Services revenue includes monthly recurring charges (“MRC”) to customers, for whom charges are contracted over a specified period of time, and variable usage fees charged to customers that purchase our business products and services. Revenue recognition commences after the provisioning, testing and acceptance of the service by the customer. MRCs continue until the expiration of the contract, or until cancellation of the service by the customer. To the extent that payments received from a customer are related to a future period, the payment is recorded as deferred revenue until the service is provided or the usage occurs.
Our Carrier Services revenue is primarily derived from usage fees charged to other carriers that terminate voice traffic over our network. Variable revenue is earned based on the length of a call, as measured by the number of minutes of duration. It is recognized upon completion of the call, and is adjusted to reflect the allowance for billing adjustments. Revenue for each customer is calculated from information received through our network switches. Our customized software tracks the information from the switches and analyzes the call detail records against stored detailed information about revenue rates. This software provides us with the ability to complete a timely and accurate analysis of revenue earned in a period. We believe that the nature of this process is such that recorded revenues are unlikely to be revised in future periods.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The fair value of an embedded conversion option that is convertible into a variable amount of shares and warrants that include price protection reset provision features are deemed to be “down-round protection” and, therefore, do not meet the scope exception for treatment as a derivative under ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging”, since “down-round protection” is not an input into the calculation of the fair value of the conversion option and warrants and cannot be considered “indexed to the Company’s own stock” which is a requirement for the scope exception as outlined under ASC 815.
The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record the embedded conversion option and warrants at their fair values as of the inception date of the agreement and at fair value as of each subsequent balance sheet date. Any change in fair value is recorded as non-operating, non-cash income or expense for each reporting period at each balance sheet date. The Company reassesses the classification of its derivative instruments at each balance sheet date. If the classification changes as a result of events during the period, the contract is reclassified as of the date of the event that caused the reclassification.
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was used to estimate the fair value of the embedded conversion options and warrants. The model includes subjective input assumptions that can materially affect the fair value estimates. The expected volatility is estimated based on the most recent historical period of time, of our common stock, equal to the weighted average life of the options.
Conversion options are recorded as debt discount and are amortized as interest expense over the life of the underlying debt instrument.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of cash, accounts payable and accrued expenses, and debt. The carrying amounts of such financial instruments approximate their respective estimated fair value due to the short-term maturities and approximate market interest rates of these instruments.
The Company adopted ASC Topic 820,
Fair Value Measurements
(“ASC Topic 820”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The standard provides a consistent definition of fair value which focuses on an exit price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The standard also prioritizes, within the measurement of fair value, the use of market-based information over entity specific information and establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based on the nature of inputs used in the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date.
The three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements is defined as follows:
|
·
|
Level 1 - inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets; liabilities in active markets;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
Level 2 - inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability other than quoted prices, either directly or indirectly, including inputs in markets that are not considered to be active; or directly or indirectly including inputs in markets that are not considered to be active;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
Level 3 - inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement
|
The following table summarizes fair value measurements by level at July 31, 2017 and January 31, 2017 for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Carrying Value at July 31, 2017
July 31, 2017
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Marketable securities- available for sale
|
|
$
|
70,500
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
70,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,912,495
|
|
|
$
|
1,912,495
|
|
Carrying Value at January 31, 2017
January 31, 2017
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities- available for sale
|
|
$
|
102,300
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
102,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2,088,684
|
|
|
$
|
2,088,684
|
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, FASB issued ASU 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(“Topic 606”). Topic 606 removes inconsistencies and weaknesses in revenue requirements, provides a more robust framework for addressing revenue issues, improves comparability of revenue recognition practices across entities, industries, jurisdictions and capital markets, provides more useful information to users of financial statements through improved disclosure requirements and simplifies the preparation of financial statements by reducing the number of requirements to which an entity must refer. The guidance in this update supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification. In August 2015, ASU 2015-14 was issued which delayed the effective date for public entities to reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this new standard.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net), which clarifies the guidance in the new revenue standard on assessing whether an entity is a principal or an agent in a revenue transaction. This conclusion impacts whether an entity reports revenue on a gross or net basis. We are currently evaluating the impact of this standard on our Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.
In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, which clarifies the guidance in the new revenue standard regarding an entity’s identification of its performance obligations in a contract, as well as an entity’s evaluation of the nature of its promise to grant a license of intellectual property and whether or not that revenue is recognized over time or at a point in time. We are currently evaluating the impact of this standard on our Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.
In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Narrow- Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients which amends the guidance in the new revenue standard on collectability, noncash consideration, presentation of sales tax, and transition. The amendments are intended to address implementation issues and provide additional practical expedients to reduce the cost and complexity of applying the new revenue standard. These amendments have the same effective date as the new revenue standard. While we are currently evaluating the method of adoption and the impact of the new revenue standard, as amended, on our Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures, we believe the adoption of the new standard may have a significant impact on the accounting for certain transactions with multiple elements or “bundled” arrangements because the requirement to have VSOE for undelivered elements under current accounting standards is eliminated under the new standard. Accordingly, we may be required to recognize as revenue a portion of the sales price upon delivery of the software, as compared to the current requirement of recognizing the entire sales price ratably over an estimated offering period. We continue to evaluate the impact of the new revenue standard on our Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments which amends the guidance on measuring credit losses on financial assets held at amortized cost. The amendment is intended to address the issue that the previous “incurred loss” methodology was restrictive for Company’s ability to record credit losses based on not yet meeting the “probable” threshold. The new language will require these assets to be valued at amortized cost presented at the net amount expected to be collected will a valuation provision. The amendments will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. We are evaluating the impact of this amendment on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In February 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-02,
Leases
. The guidance would require lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets as lease liabilities with corresponding right –of-use assets. The guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of its pending adoption of ASU 2016-02 on its consolidated financial statements
NOTE 4 – DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On October 31, 2016, the Company entered into the asset purchase and sale agreement (the “Agreement”) with Giggle Fiber, LLC. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Company sold the equipment, customer list of Webrunner and bank accounts related to Webrunner for $413,861, payable in installments. The Company recorded gain on sales of assets of $111,467 as discontinued operations during the year ended January 31, 2017. The total consideration received was $401,052.
The following table shows the results of operations of Webrunner for the six months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016 which are included in the loss from discontinued operations:
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
75,063
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
160,755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administration
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(40,001
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(95,790
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(44,670
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(89,340
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(9,608
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(24,375
|
)
|
NOTE 5 – NOTES PAYABLE
The Company had the following notes payable and notes payable – related party outstanding as of July 31, 2017 and January 31, 2017:
Notes Payable
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Dated – October 30, 2014
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
Dated – August 4, 2016
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Dated – September 30, 2016
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
65,476
|
|
Dated – March 10, 2017
|
|
|
173,104
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Dated – April 11, 2017
|
|
|
86,495
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Dated – May 16, 2017
|
|
|
98,136
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Dated – May 30, 2017
|
|
|
73,714
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Dated – July 10, 2017
|
|
|
45,600
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Dated – July 21, 2017
|
|
|
165,596
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total notes payable
|
|
$
|
677,645
|
|
|
$
|
100,476
|
|
Less: debt discount and deferred financing fees
|
|
|
(177,116
|
)
|
|
|
(1,546
|
)
|
|
|
|
500,529
|
|
|
|
98,930
|
|
Less: current portion of notes payable
|
|
|
500,529
|
|
|
|
98,930
|
|
Long-term notes payable
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
The Company recognized amortization expense related to the debt discount and deferred financing fees of $75,472 and $0 for the six months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The total borrowings and principal repayment on note payable during the six months ended July 31, 2017 was $665,109 and $338,982, respectively.
Dated – October 30, 2014
On October 30, 2014, the Company exercised the comprehensive acquisition agreement of Webrunner, LLC (“Webrunner”) and in the acquisition the Company assumed the debt of RNC Media in the amount of $10,000. The Note does not have any interest payable and is due upon demand.
Dated – August 4, 2016
The note was issued to Mr. Doyle Knudson, are subject to annual interest of 15% and are secured by 250,000 shares of common stock. The note matured in February 2017. The total cash proceeds received from the note was $25,000
Dated – September 30, 2016
The Company entered into the revenue based factoring agreement with Powerup Lending Group, Ltd. And received cash of $125,000. The note includes an original issue discount and financing fee of $2,950 and the Company received cash of $122,050. The Company is required to make weekly principal and interest payments of $4,560 for a period of 34 weeks through May 30, 2017. During the three months ended April 30, 2017, the Company repaid $65,476 fully.
Dated – March 10, 2017
The Company entered into the revenue based factoring agreement with PIRS Capital, LLC. The principal amount of note is $291,900 and the note includes an original issue discount and financing fee of $86,499 and the Company received cash of $205,401. The Company is required to make weekly principal and interest payments of $5,657 for a period of 51 weeks through February 23, 2018.
Dated – April 11, 2017
The Company entered into the revenue based factoring agreement with Powerup Lending Group, Ltd. The principal amount of note is $156,250 and the note includes an original issue discount and financing fee of $33,750 and the Company received cash of $122,500. The Company is required to make weekly principal and interest payments of $4,560 for a period of 34 weeks through December 5, 2017.
Dated – May 16, 2017
The Company entered into the agreement with Arcarius LLC. The principal amount of note is $136,000 and the note includes an original issue discount and financing fee of $38,495 and the Company received cash of $97,505. The Company is required to make daily principal and interest payments of $773 for a period of 176 days.
Dated – May 30, 2017
The Company entered into the revenue based factoring agreement with Powerup Lending Group, Ltd. The principal amount of note is $108,000 and the note includes an original issue discount and financing fee of $29,600 and the Company received cash of $78,400. The Company is required to make weekly principal and interest payments of $4,286 for a period of 26 weeks through December 30, 2017.
Dated – July 10, 2017
The Company entered into the revenue based factoring agreement with Powerup Lending Group, Ltd. The principal amount of note is $54,000 and the note includes an original issue discount and financing fee of $14,800 and the Company received cash of $39,200. The Company is required to make daily principal and interest payments of $600 for a period of 90 days.
Dated – July 21, 2017
The Company entered into the revenue based factoring agreement with PIRS Capital, LLC. The principal amount of note is $170,000 and the note includes an original issue discount and financing fee of $47,899 and the Company received cash of $122,101. The Company is required to make weekly principal and interest payments of $4,404 for a period of 39 weeks through April 20, 2018.
Notes Payable – related party
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Dated – April 23, 2015
|
|
$
|
231,250
|
|
|
$
|
231,250
|
|
Dated – December 21, 2016
|
|
|
350,932
|
|
|
|
542,349
|
|
Total notes payable
|
|
|
582,182
|
|
|
|
773,599
|
|
Less: current portion of notes payable
|
|
|
582,182
|
|
|
|
614,085
|
|
Long-term notes payable
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
159,514
|
|
The total borrowings and principal repayment on related party note payable during the six months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016 was $191,417 and $301,278, respectively
Dated – April 23, 2015
On May 1, 2015, in connection with the acquisition of the assets of Net D Consulting, Inc. (“Net D”), the Company issued a $350,000 note which bears no interest and matures on October 7, 2016. The Company made repayments on the note of $0 during the six months ended July 31, 2017.
Dated – December 21, 2016
On December 21, 2016, the Company entered into the new agreement which the company issued a note payable of $574,252 for payment of the Note dated January 18, 2016. The Note bears interest rate of $7.29% for 1
st
12 months and then 3.25% for 13 through 18 months. The Company is required to make monthly principal and interest payments of $226,985 for a period of 18 months through June 20, 2018. The Company paid principal and interest payments of $191,417 for the six months ended July 31, 2017.
NOTE 6 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE
The Company had the following convertible notes payable outstanding as of July 31, 2017 and January 31, 2017:
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Promissory Note – Issued August 22, 2014, with a fixed conversion price of $0.10 per common share or 17,000,000 shares of common stock.
|
|
$
|
1,700,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,700,000
|
|
Promissory notes – Issued in fiscal year 2016, with variable conversion features.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
83,951
|
|
Promissory notes – Issued in fiscal year 2017, with variable conversion features.
|
|
|
588,728
|
|
|
|
876,791
|
|
Promissory notes – Issued in fiscal year 2018, with variable conversion features.
|
|
|
725,599
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total convertible notes payable
|
|
|
3,014,327
|
|
|
|
2,660,742
|
|
Less: debt discount and deferred financing fees
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(598,790
|
)
|
|
|
|
3,014,327
|
|
|
|
2,061,952
|
|
Less: current portion of convertible notes payable
|
|
|
3,014,327
|
|
|
|
2,061,952
|
|
Long-term convertible notes payable
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Notes in Default
Certain convertible notes held by the company are in default. During the three month period ended July 31, 2017, the Company did not maintain the covenant requiring the Company to be current with all financial filings. As a result of the breach, the convertible debentures are due on demand. No demand for payment has been made as at July 31, 2017. The terms of default for notes are as follows:
|
·
|
Default interest rates ranging from 20% to 24 %
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
The Conversion Price discount for certain notes shall be permanently increased by 10%
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
The Company shall pay an amount equal to the greater of
|
|
·
|
(i) 150% times the sum of the outstanding principal amount of certain Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest on the unpaid principal amount of this Notes to the date of payment (the “Mandatory Prepayment Date”) plus Default Interest.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
(ii) the “parity value” of the Default Sum to be prepaid, where parity value means (a) the highest number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of or otherwise pursuant to such Default Sum treating the Trading Day immediately preceding the Mandatory Prepayment Date as the “Conversion Date” for purposes of determining the lowest applicable Conversion Price, unless the Default Event arises as a result of a breach in respect of a specific Conversion Date in which case such Conversion Date shall be the Conversion Date, multiplied by (b) the highest Closing Price for the Common Stock during the period beginning on the date of first occurrence of the Event of Default and ending one day prior to the Mandatory Prepayment Date
|
During the three and six month periods ended July 31, 2017, the Company recorded default penalty interest of $333,829 (2016: $nil).
The unamortized debt discount has been accelerated and recognized in the consolidated statement of operations and loss. The Company recognized amortization expense related to the debt discount and deferred financing fees of $1,078,112 and $566,618 for the six months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Promissory Note - August 22, 2014
In connection with the settlement agreement entered into with Doyle Knudson, an investor, in 2014, the Company issued a $1.8 million convertible promissory note with a fixed conversion price of $0.10 per share or 18,000,000 shares of common stock. The note is subject to annual interest of 10%, matured in August 2015 and is currently past due. In May and December 2015, a total of $100,000 note principal was transferred to another lender.
The Company initially recorded a discount on the convertible note due to a beneficial conversion feature of $358,200 and fully amortized for the year ended January 31, 2016. Due to the variable conversion rates in the other convertible notes (see below), the $1,700,000 balance of the note became tainted and the embedded fixed conversion option was bifurcated and accounted for as a derivative liability.
Promissory Notes - Issued in fiscal year 2016
During the year ended January 31, 2016, the Company issued a total of $449,666 of promissory notes with the following terms:
|
·
|
Terms ranging from 9 months to 2 years
|
|
·
|
Annual interest rates ranging from 5% to 12%
|
|
·
|
Convertible at the option of the holders either at issuance or 180 days from issuance. The note dated September 29, 2015 is convertible at the later of the maturity date or date of default.
|
|
·
|
Conversion prices are typically based on the discounted (50% to 60% discount) lowest trading prices of the Company’s shares during various periods prior to conversion. Certain notes allow for the conversion price to be the lower of $0.01 or the discounted trading price
|
Certain notes allow the Company to redeem the notes at rates ranging from 118% to 148% depending on the redemption date provided that no redemption is allowed after the 180
th
day. Likewise, certain notes include original issue discounts totaling to $24,166. During the year ended January 31, 2016, the Company also recognized deferred financing fees totaling $55,142
The Company determined that the conversion feature met the definition of a liability in accordance with ASC Topic No. 815 - 40, Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in Entity’s Own Stock and therefore bifurcated the embedded conversion option once the note becomes convertible and accounted for it as a derivative liability. The fair value of the conversion feature was recorded as a debt discount and amortized to interest expense over the term of the note.
The Company valued the conversion feature using the Black Scholes valuation model. The fair value of the derivative liability for all the notes that became convertible during the year amounted to $459,733. $209,000 of the value assigned to the derivative liability was recognized as a debt discount to the notes while the balance of $250,733 was recognized as a day 1 derivative loss.
Promissory Notes - Issued in fiscal year 2017
During the year ended January 31, 2017, the Company issued a total of $1,266,417 of promissory notes with the following terms:
|
·
|
Terms ranging from 9 months to 20 months
|
|
·
|
Annual interest rates ranging from 8% to 12%
|
|
·
|
Convertible at the option of the holders either at issuance or 180 days from issuance.
|
|
·
|
Conversion prices are typically based on the discounted (50% to 60% discount) lowest trading prices of the Company’s shares during various periods prior to conversion. Certain notes allow for the conversion price to be a floor of $0.0005 and $0.00005 per share.
|
Certain notes allow the Company to redeem the notes at rates ranging from 118% to 150% depending on the redemption date provided that no redemption is allowed after the 180
th
day. Likewise, certain notes include original issue discounts and deferred financing cost totaling to $146,976. The Company received cash of $785,858. During the year ended January 31, 2017, the Company repaid notes with principal amounts totaling to $33,333 and a total of $5,517 accrued interest was also added to principal.
The Company valued the conversion feature using the Black Scholes valuation model. The fair value of the derivative liability for all the notes that became convertible, including the notes issued in prior years, during the year ended January 31, 2017 amounted to $3,245,991. $1,356,692 of the value assigned to the derivative liability was recognized as a debt discount to the notes while the balance of $1,889,299 was recognized as a “day 1” derivative loss.
Promissory Notes - Issued in fiscal year 2018
During the six months ended July 31, 2017, the Company issued a total of $496,822 of promissory notes with the following terms:
|
·
|
Terms 9 months
|
|
·
|
Annual interest rates 10%
|
|
·
|
Convertible at the option of the holders either at issuance.
|
|
·
|
Conversion prices are typically based on the discounted (40% to 50% discount) lowest trading prices of the Company’s shares during various periods prior to conversion.
|
Certain notes allow the Company to redeem the notes at rates ranging from 120% to 150% depending on the redemption date provided that no redemption is allowed after the 180
th
day. Likewise, certain notes include original issue discounts totaling to $12,600 and the Company received cash of $92,500 and replaced old notes and accrued interest of $283,063.
The Company determined that the conversion feature met the definition of a liability in accordance with ASC Topic No. 815 - 40, Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in Entity’s Own Stock and therefore bifurcated the embedded conversion option once the note becomes convertible and accounted for it as a derivative liability. The fair value of the conversion feature was recorded as a debt discount and amortized to interest expense over the term of the note.
The Company valued the conversion feature using the Black Scholes valuation model. The fair value of the derivative liability for all the notes that became convertible during the six months ended July 31, 2017 amounted to $1,156,832. $484,222 of the value assigned to the derivative liability was recognized as a debt discount to the notes, $194,994 was recognized as a “day 1” derivative loss and $166,975 was recognized as gain on settlement of debt and $644,591 offset the fair value of the derivative liability that related to the notes that were replaced by the new notes.
Conversion
During the six months ended July 31, 2017, the Company converted notes with principal amounts of $200,566 and accrued interest of $13,962 into 3,985,956,874 shares of common stock. The corresponding derivative liability at the date of conversion of $526,791 was credited to common stock issued at a discount.
Replacement of Notes
During the year ended January 31, 2017, the Company assigned 16 notes with outstanding principal amounts totaling to $424,178 to two lenders which resulted to the payment of prepayment penalties amounting to $156,809 and recognized loss on debt settlement of $267,646 due to the modification of the replacement note conversion feature, and the difference between the fair value of derivative of the conversion feature.
As a result of replacement of notes during the six months ended July 31, 2017, the Company recognized gain on settlement of debt of $166,975.
NOTE 7 –
DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES
The Company analyzed the conversion option for derivative accounting consideration under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and hedging, and determined that the instrument should be classified as a liability since the conversion option becomes effective at issuance resulting in there being no explicit limit to the number of shares to be delivered upon settlement of the above conversion options.
ASC 815 requires we assess the fair market value of derivative liability at the end of each reporting period and recognize any change in the fair market value as other income or expense item.
The Company determined our derivative liabilities to be a Level 3 fair value measurement and used the Black-Scholes pricing model to calculate the fair value as of July 31, 2017. The Black-Scholes model requires six basic data inputs: the exercise or strike price, time to expiration, the risk-free interest rate, the current stock price, the estimated volatility of the stock price in the future, and the dividend rate. Changes to these inputs could produce a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement. The fair value of each convertible note is estimated using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The following weighted-average assumptions were used in the July 31, 2017 and January 31, 2017:
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
July 31, 2017
|
|
January 31, 2017
|
Expected term
|
|
0.01 - 0.88 years
|
|
0 - 1.50 years
|
Expected average volatility
|
|
294% - 483%
|
|
120% - 716%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
0.51% - 1.13%
|
|
0.18% - 0.84%
|
At July 31, 2017, the estimated fair values of the liabilities measured on a recurring basis are as follows:
July 31, 2017
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Promissory Note – Issued August 22, 2014
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,700
|
|
|
$
|
1,700
|
|
Promissory Notes – Issued in fiscal year 2016
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Promissory Notes – Issued in fiscal year 2017
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
898,684
|
|
|
|
898,684
|
|
Promissory Notes – Issued in fiscal year 2018
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,012,111
|
|
|
|
1,012,111
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,912,495
|
|
|
$
|
1,912,495
|
|
The following table summarizes the changes in the derivative liabilities during the six months ended July 31, 2017:
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Observable Inputs (Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance - January 31, 2017
|
|
$
|
2,088,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addition of new derivatives recognized as debt discounts
|
|
|
484,222
|
|
Addition of new derivatives recognized as loss on derivatives
|
|
|
194,994
|
|
Derivatives settled upon conversion of debt and exercise of warrants
|
|
|
(526,791
|
)
|
Gain on debt extinguishment
|
|
|
(166,975
|
)
|
Gain on change in fair value of the derivative
|
|
|
(161,639
|
)
|
Balance - July 31, 2017
|
|
$
|
1,912,495
|
|
The following table summarizes the loss on derivative liability included in the income statement for the six months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Day one loss due to derivative liabilities on convertible notes
|
|
$
|
194,994
|
|
|
$
|
632,279
|
|
Gain on change in fair value of the derivative liabilities
|
|
|
(161,639
|
)
|
|
|
(530,650
|
)
|
Loss on change in the fair value of derivative liabilities
|
|
$
|
33,355
|
|
|
$
|
101,629
|
|
NOTE 8 – EQUITY
Preferred Stock
Series A Preferred Stock
There were no issuances of the Series A Preferred Stock during the six months ended July 31, 2017.
As of July 31, 2017 and January 31, 2017, 1,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding, respectively.
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
There were no issuances of the Series B Preferred Stock during the six months ended July 31, 2017.
As of July 31, 2017 and January 31, 2017, 68,178,500 shares of Series B Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding, respectively.
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
There were no issuances of the Series C Preferred Stock during the six months ended July 31, 2017.
As of July 31, 2017 and January 31, 2017, 16 shares of Series C Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding, respectively.
The Company determined the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock is considered to be contingently redeemable convertible and as a result, has been classified as mezzanine equity in the Company’s balance sheet, as of July 31, 2017 and January 31, 2017.
Series D Convertible Preferred Stock
There were no issuances of the Series D Preferred Stock during the six months ended July 31, 2017.
As of July 31, 2017 and January 31, 2017, 21 shares of Series D Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding, respectively.
The Company determined the Series D Convertible Preferred Stock is considered to be contingently redeemable convertible and as a result, has been classified as mezzanine equity in the Company’s balance sheet, as of July 31, 2017 and January 31, 2017.
Common stock
The Company is authorized to issue 14,900,000,000 shares of common stock at a par value of $0.001.
During the six months ended July 31, 2017, the Company issued common shares, as follows:
|
·
|
3,985,956,874 common shares were issued for the conversion of debt and accrued interest of $214,528.
|
As of July 31, 2017, and January 31, 2017, 6,343,046,507 and 2,357,089,633 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding, respectively.
Warrants and Options
Warrants
As of July 31, 2017, and January 31, 2017, there are no warrants outstanding.
Options
The Company has 9,100,000 options issued in connection with the acquisition of Webrunner.
The following table summarizes information relating to outstanding and exercisable stock options as of July 31, 2017:
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Outstanding, January 31, 2017
|
|
|
9,100,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Forfeited/canceled
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Outstanding, July 31, 2017
|
|
|
9,100,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Weighted Average
Remaining Contractual
life (in years)
|
|
|
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Number
of Shares
|
|
|
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
9,100,000
|
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
9,100,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
The options have no intrinsic value at July 31, 2017.
Employee Incentive Bonus Plan
On June 27, 2016, the Company entered into employee agreement with two employees that contain preferred share issuance incentive bonuses based on various sales targets for XTELUS, for the 12- month period ending June 27, 2017. The first award contains cash compensation of $10,000 per month and the ability to earn 500,000 shares of Series B preferred stock if XTELUS revenue of $1,000,000 is generated within 12 months. The second award contains cash compensation of $20,000 per month, 5 shares of Series D preferred stock earned on June 27, 2017 (with 1 share earned immediately upon revenue of $100,000 being generated within first six months) and the ability to earn up to 6,500,000 shares of Series B preferred stock based upon XTELUS revenue targets up to $1,000,000 over 12 months and up to an additional 3,000,000 shares of Series B preferred stock based upon XTELUS revenue targets up between $1,000,000 and greater than $7,000,000 over 12 months. The Company assessed the probability that the revenue targets will be met and determined that the target revenue will most likely meet $1,000,000 and based on the stock awards, estimated the fair value of 6,500,000 shares of Preferred B stock at $32,500, 5 shares of Preferred D stock at $500,000 and 500,000 shares of Preferred B stock at $2,500, respectively. For the six months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized stock based compensation of $174,000 and $61,157 under these awards, with a corresponding credit to additional paid in capital.
NOTE 9 – CONTINGENCIES
The Company is a party to various legal claims which have arisen in the normal course of business, none of which are expected to have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of the Company.
NOTE 10 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
During the six months ended July 31, 2017, the Company paid a total of $137,700 consulting fees to the company’s officers.
As of July 31, 2017, and January 31, 2017, the amount owed to the company’s officers was $92,500 and $0, respectively.
As of July 31, 2017, and January 31, 2017, the Company has outstanding notes payable to Net D totaling to $582,182 and $773,599, respectively, in connection with the Company’s acquisition of Connexum and certain assets of Net D (see Note 5). The sole owner of Net D is a director the Company. Net D also performs certain services for the Company in connection with the latter’s Carrier Services business. During the six months ended July 31, 2017, the Company incurred total fees in connection with such services of $164,093. As of July 31, 2017, and January 31, 2017, the Company has an outstanding payable to Net D of $248,928 and $305,458, respectively.