MOTN Motion Acquisition Corporation

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Risks Related to DocGo’s Business Strategy

DocGo’s failure to implement its business strategy could adversely affect its business.

DocGo’s future financial performance and success is dependent in large part upon its ability to implement its business strategy successfully. DocGo’s business strategy includes several initiatives, including developing contractual relationships with new healthcare provider partners and expanding its business with existing partners; capitalizing on organic growth opportunities such as growing complementary and integrated service offerings, particularly with respect to its mobile health solutions; pursuing selective acquisitions to expand its geographic presence, among other things; and enhancing operational efficiencies and productivity. DocGo may not be able to implement its business strategy successfully or achieve the anticipated benefits of its business plan. If DocGo is unable to do so, its long-term growth, profitability and ability to service its debt will be adversely affected. Even if DocGo is able to implement some or all of the initiatives of its business plan, one or more may not be successful in achieving the desired goals and DocGo’s operating results may not improve to the extent it anticipates, or at all, or could be adversely affected.

Implementation of DocGo’s business strategy could also be affected by a number of factors beyond its control, including increased competition, government regulation, general economic conditions or increased operating costs or expenses. In particular, DocGo’s future success is contingent on DocGo’s ability to penetrate new markets and, to a lesser extent, further penetrate existing markets, which is subject to a number of uncertainties, many of which are beyond DocGo’s control. Expanding service offerings such as DocGo’s mobile health solutions also carries unique risks, including lack of market acceptance and not realizing any return on the capital invested. Government regulations in both DocGo’s domestic and international markets can also delay or prevent expansion or the introduction of new service offerings, or require changes to some of the services DocGo already offers, which could negatively impact the success of DocGo’s strategies. In addition, to the extent DocGo has misjudged the nature and extent of industry trends or its competition, it may have difficulty in identifying new provider partners, achieving any geographic expansion, introducing new service offerings or achieving DocGo’s other strategic objectives. As such, due to these and other known and unknown risks, DocGo cannot assure you that its business strategy will be successful, and any failure to effectively implement its business strategy and otherwise grow the business could have a material adverse effect on DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

DocGo’s reliance on its contractual relationships with its healthcare provider partners and other strategic alliances could adversely affect its business.

DocGo relies significantly on its contractual relationships with its healthcare provider partners and other strategic partners and alliances to generate revenues, expand into new markets and further penetrate existing markets. In recent years, DocGo has entered into strategic business relationships with, among others, healthcare providers and hospital systems, to take advantage of commercial opportunities across its operations, but particularly in its medical transportation services segment. DocGo’s contract with Fresenius, under which DocGo generated approximately 7.1% of its revenues in the year ended December 31, 2021, is of particular importance to DocGo’s results. The structure of DocGo’s relationships with its healthcare provider partners is a novel model in DocGo’s industry and because there is little precedent for this approach, there can be no assurances that it will be operationally or financially successful in the long term.

DocGo’s contractual relationships with its healthcare provider partners and its reliance on revenues generated pursuant to these arrangements carry commercial and other risks and uncertainties that are different from those underlying DocGo’s other revenue streams, including the opportunity cost of not pursuing the specific venture independently or with other partners. For example, strategic partners may have business or economic interests that are inconsistent with those of DocGo and may take actions contrary to DocGo’s interests. While DocGo typically manages the day-to-day operations, DocGo’s partners have certain consent rights and they may not agree with decisions that DocGo believes are appropriate or are otherwise in the venture’s or its best interests. This structure can also lead to disputes with partners, which could require DocGo’s management to commit additional time and resources to resolve any disagreements or, in some instances, may lead to arbitration or litigation. Contractual relationships like these typically carry termination rights and one or more of DocGo’s partners may choose to exit the relationship prematurely and, in certain arrangements, the partner may have the option to put its interest in the venture to DocGo or acquire DocGo’s stake at a predetermined price, even if the relationship is proving beneficial to DocGo and it would choose to continue the arrangement. If one of DocGo’s ventures or any of its strategic partners is subject to a regulatory investigation or legal dispute or is otherwise the subject of any negative publicity, DocGo may be associated with the matter and similarly harmed, regardless of whether the specific partnership or DocGo itself had any connection to the underlying matters. In addition, DocGo may, in certain circumstances, be liable for the actions of its partners. Contractual relationships such as these can also raise fraud and abuse issues. For example, the Office of Inspector General (the “OIG”) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) has taken the position that certain contractual relationships between a party which makes referrals and a party which receives referrals for a specific type of service may violate the federal Anti-Kickback Statute if not appropriately structured. Any of the foregoing risks or others related to DocGo’s reliance on strategic partners and other relationships could have a material adverse effect on DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

DocGo incurs significant up-front costs in its client relationships and any inability to maintain and grow these client relationships over time or to recover these costs could adversely affect its business.

DocGo’s business strategy depends heavily on achieving economies of scale because its initial up-front investment is costly and the associated revenue is recognized on a ratable basis. DocGo devotes significant resources to establish relationships with its clients and implement its solutions. This is particularly so in the case of large enterprises like those DocGo implements with its healthcare provider partners. Accordingly, DocGo’s results of operations will depend in substantial part on its ability to maintain and grow its relationships with customers over time. Additionally, as DocGo’s business is growing significantly, its client acquisition costs could outpace its build-up of recurring revenue, and DocGo may be unable to manage its total operating costs enough to achieve profitability, or if achieved, to maintain it. If DocGo fails to achieve appropriate economies of scale or if it fails to manage or anticipate demand, its business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

The growth of DocGo’s business depends, in part, on its ability to execute on its acquisition strategy.

A significant portion of DocGo’s historical growth has occurred through acquisitions, and it anticipates continued growth through acquisitions in the future. DocGo’s growth strategy is primarily focused on geographic expansion, often as part of growing its relationship with an existing healthcare provider partner, and DocGo expects acquisitions to be the primary means of acquiring the infrastructure, licenses or other resources necessary to enter new markets in the future. DocGo is presently evaluating, and expects to continue evaluating on an ongoing basis, a variety of possible acquisition transactions.

DocGo cannot predict the timing of any contemplated transactions, and there can be no assurances that DocGo will identify suitable acquisition opportunities in the geographies into which it expects to grow or, if it does, that any transaction can be consummated on terms acceptable to it. DocGo also competes for acquisitions with other potential acquirers, some of which may have greater financial or operational resources than DocGo. A significant change in DocGo’s business or the economy, an unexpected decrease in cash flows or any restrictions imposed by DocGo’s debt may limit its ability to obtain the necessary capital for acquisitions or otherwise impede its ability to complete an acquisition. Certain proposed acquisitions or dispositions may also trigger regulatory review by governmental agencies, including the U.S. Department of Justice (the “DOJ”), the U.S. Federal Trade Commission(the “FTC”), under their respective regulatory authority. Any delay, prohibition or modification required by regulatory authorities for competitive purposes or otherwise could adversely affect the terms of a proposed acquisition or could require DocGo to modify or abandon an otherwise attractive acquisition opportunity. The failure to identify suitable transaction partners and to consummate transactions on acceptable terms or at all could adversely affect DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

DocGo’s acquisition strategy exposes it to significant risks and additional costs.

Acquisitions involve risks that the businesses acquired will not perform as expected or provide sufficient infrastructure and other resources necessary to operate in a given geography and DocGo’s judgments regarding the value, strengths and weaknesses and profitability of acquired businesses may prove wrong. DocGo may become liable for certain unforeseen pre-acquisition liabilities of an acquired business, including, among others, tax liabilities, environmental liabilities, liabilities for regulatory violations and liabilities for employment practices, and these liabilities could be significant. In addition, an acquisition could result in the impairment of client relationships and other acquired assets such as goodwill. DocGo may also incur costs and experience inefficiencies to the extent an acquisition expands the services, markets or geographies in which it operates. Acquisitions may require that DocGo incur additional debt to finance the transaction, which could be substantial and limit its operating flexibility or, alternatively, acquisitions may require that DocGo issue stock as consideration, which could dilute share ownership. Acquisitions can also involve post-transaction disputes regarding a number of matters, including a purchase price or working capital adjustment, earn-out or other contingent payments, environmental liabilities or other obligations. DocGo’s recent growth and its acquisition strategy have placed, and will continue to place, significant demands on management’s time, which may divert their attention from DocGo’s day-to-day business operations, and may lead to significant due diligence and other expenses regardless of whether DocGo pursues or consummates any acquisition. DocGo may also not be able to manage its growth resulting from acquisitions due to the number, diversity and geographic disparity of the businesses it may acquire or for other reasons. These and other risks related to acquisitions could adversely affect DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Any inability to successfully integrate acquisitions or realize their anticipated benefits could adversely affect DocGo’s business.

Acquisitions require that DocGo integrate separate companies that historically operated independently or as part of another, larger organization, and had different systems, processes and cultures. DocGo may not be able to successfully integrate any business it has acquired or may acquire, or may not be able to do so in a timely, efficient or cost-effective manner. Risks related to the successful integration of an acquired business include:

DocGo’s inability to manage its growth through acquisitions, including the integration process, and to realize the anticipated benefits of an acquisition could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to DocGo’s Business and Industry

The COVID-19 pandemic has materially impacted DocGo’s business.

In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus (COVID-19) surfaced in Wuhan, China. Since then, the virus has spread globally, including to the United States, and the World Health Organization has declared the outbreak a pandemic and the Secretary of HHS has declared a public health emergency. Public health organizations and international, federal, state and local governments have implemented measures to combat the spread of COVID-19, including restrictions on movement such as quarantines, “stay-at-home” orders and social distancing ordinances and restricting or prohibiting outright some or all forms of commercial and business activity. These measures, or others that may be implemented in the future, although temporary in nature, may become more restrictive or continue indefinitely.

The COVID-19 pandemic and its national and global impact have adversely affected DocGo, particularly in its healthcare transportation segment, and this segment and other aspects of DocGo’s business may be adversely affected by the pandemic and its impact in the future. DocGo’s and its customers’ businesses have generally been classified as “essential” in most jurisdictions, permitting DocGo and its customers to continue operations in most markets. However, there can be no assurance that DocGo’s business or those of its customers’ and suppliers’ will continue to be classified as “essential” in the future, or that DocGo or they will not voluntarily limit or cease operations in one or more markets if it or they believe it is in the company’s or their best interests. For example, healthcare providers have limited the availability of elective procedures, at times entirely stopping these procedures, which has had an adverse impact on DocGo’s revenues related to non-emergency transportation services. DocGo has also determined to increase its reserves for bad debt since the pandemic began because of uncertainty regarding payments from some uninsured consumers. Further, DocGo’s business can put its healthcare professionals in direct contact with patients infected with COVID-19, which significantly increases the risk that DocGo employees will contract the virus. Should there be an outbreak of COVID-19 among DocGo’s employees in one or more of its markets, in response, DocGo may need to significantly reduce or cease operations there. The demands of the pandemic have also placed significant financial burdens on healthcare providers, including DocGo’s healthcare provider partners and other customers, and if one or more of DocGo’s partners or other customers declare bankruptcy or otherwise restrict or cease its operations, DocGo’s business may be harmed. The pandemic may also adversely affect DocGo’s ability to collect accounts receivable. DocGo also utilized several government programs in 2020 related to the pandemic, receiving approximately $1.0 million in payments through the Public Health and Social Services Emergency Fund authorized under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act and related legislation as well as various state and local programs, net of amounts that will be repaid to HHS. DocGo also received accelerated Medicare payments of approximately $2.4 million that were required to be repaid beginning in April 2021. See Note 19 to the notes to the audited consolidated financial statements of DocGo included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

DocGo’s cost structure has also been adversely impacted by the pandemic. A number of DocGo’s suppliers have also been negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and there have been significant disruptions in its supply chains, particularly with respect to the personal protective equipment, or PPE, that DocGo’s healthcare professionals require to do their jobs. At times, sufficient levels of PPE have not been available and these shortages have limited DocGo’s ability to meet demand and provide its services to customers in a timely manner. Further, the demand for PPE in the healthcare industry and the public at large caused by the pandemic has significantly increased the cost of PPE and DocGo may not be able to recover these increased costs in the rates it charges for its services, which could adversely affect DocGo’s profitability. Limitations on the availability or increases in the price of PPE have and could in the future continue to adversely affect DocGo’s business and results of operations. DocGo’s suppliers’ businesses have similarly generally been classified as “essential business” permitting operations to continue, but DocGo cannot be certain that its suppliers will continue to be classified as “essential” or that they will not voluntarily limit or cease operations or that a sufficient quantity of PPE will be available and at prices that fit within DocGo’s cost structure.

DocGo’s management is focused on mitigating the impact of COVID-19 on its business and the risk to its employees. This focus has diverted management’s attention away from normal business operations. Additionally, DocGo has taken a number of precautionary measures intended to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on its business and the risk to its employees, including implementing detailed cleaning and disinfecting processes at its facilities and across its fleet, adhering to social distancing protocols and encouraging employees to work from home when possible, any of which could adversely affect DocGo’s business. While these measures and others DocGo may take are temporary, they may continue until the pandemic is contained and restrictions on movement or commercial and business activity and related orders or ordinances are sufficiently modified or lifted, and could amplify existing risks or introduce new risks that could adversely affect DocGo’s business, including, but not limited to, risks related to internal controls and cybersecurity and others identified in these risk factors. For example, DocGo’s platform and the other systems or networks used in its business may experience an increase in attempted cyberattacks seeking to take advantage of shifts to employees working remotely using their household or personal Internet networks and to leverage fears promulgated by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conversely, the pandemic has significantly increased the demand for DocGo’s remote and mobile testing and vaccination services and many of these contracts are on a short-term basis, often spanning only a number of weeks or months. Much of DocGo’s revenue, employee and operations growth has occurred during recent years, which has been partially driven by significant COVID-related impacts. For example, the Company estimates that COVID testing relating revenue for 2021 was approximately $110 million. Our ability to forecast our future operating results is limited and subject to a number of uncertainties, including our ability to predict revenue and expense levels, and plan for and model future growth. Moreover, it is unlikely this new demand will be sustained in the long term, at least with respect to COVID-19-related testing and vaccination, particularly if the pandemic subsides, and there can be no assurances that DocGo will be able to find alternative revenue streams to compensate for the loss. These uncertainties are exacerbated by the effects of the Covid-19 pandemic.

The pandemic has adversely affected many industries as well as the economies and financial markets of many countries, including the United States, causing a significant deceleration of economic activity. This slowdown has reduced production, decreased demand for a broad variety of goods and services, diminished trade levels, and led to widespread corporate downsizing, causing a sharp increase in unemployment. There has also been disruption to and extreme volatility in the global capital markets, which could increase the cost of, or entirely restrict access to, capital. The impact of this pandemic on the U.S. and world economies is uncertain and, until the pandemic is contained, these adverse impacts could worsen, impacting all segments of the global economy, and result in a significant recession or worse.

While the detrimental business impacts of COVID-19 moderated somewhat in 2021 as compared to 2020, considerable uncertainty still surrounds the COVID-19 virus and its potential effects, including potential future variants of the virus and the extent of and effectiveness of any responses taken on local, state, national and global levels. While DocGo expects the pandemic and related events will continue to impact its business, the unpredictable and unprecedented nature of the pandemic, including new variants and the extent to which vaccines will be made available globally, makes it impractical to identify all potential risks or estimate the full extent and scope of the impact on DocGo’s business and industry, as well as national, regional and global markets and economies. Accordingly, DocGo’s ability to conduct its business in the manner previously or currently expected could be materially and adversely affected, and any of the foregoing risks and uncertainties as well as those that have not yet manifested themselves or been identified could materially and adversely affect DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations. The pandemic may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described herein.

The high level of competition in DocGo’s industry could adversely affect its business.

The medical transportation industry is highly competitive. In providing these services to DocGo’s healthcare provider partners, individual customers and municipalities, DocGo competes with governmental entities, including cities and fire districts, hospitals, local and volunteer private providers, as well as other regional and local private companies. The industry also includes several large national and regional providers such as Rural/Metro Corporation, Falck, American Medical Response (AMR), Southwest Ambulance, Paramedics Plus and Acadian Ambulance. The most important competitive factors in the medical transportation services industry include the ability to improve customer service, such as on-time performance and efficient call intake; to provide comprehensive clinical care; and to recruit, train and motivate employees, particularly ambulance crews who have direct contact with patients and healthcare personnel. Pricing, billing and reimbursement expertise are also very important.

While the telehealth market is in an early stage of development, it is competitive and DocGo expects it to attract increased competition, which could make it difficult for DocGo to succeed. The major competitors in the industry include much larger, national or regional telehealth providers such as Teladoc, Livongo, Amwell, and One Medical that generally provide telehealth on behalf of self-insured employers and insurance plans. These competitors, however, generally do not provide direct patient care or last-mile care on behalf of the provider organization. DocGo also believes there are several smaller, private organizations providing in-home or in-site care utilizing different, higher cost healthcare providers. Non-traditional providers and others such as large health systems or payors, some of which may be DocGo customers or partners, may enter the space using consumer-grade video conferencing platforms such as Zoom and Twilio or develop innovative technologies or business activities that could be disruptive to the industry. Competition could also increase from large technology companies such as Apple, Amazon, Facebook, Verizon, or Microsoft, who may develop their own telehealth solutions, as well as from large retailers like Walmart, which see an opportunity in the surge in interest in telehealth in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic. Competition in the telehealth industry is primarily based on scale; ease of use, convenience and accessibility; brand recognition; breadth, depth, and efficacy of telehealth services; technology; clinical quality; customer support; cost; reputation; and customer satisfaction and value.

DocGo may not be successful in maintaining or growing its competitive position in one or more of its existing markets or in those into which it may expand. Some of DocGo’s competitors may have access to greater financial or other resources than it does, which may afford them greater power, efficiency, financial flexibility, geographical reach or capital resources for growth. In addition, some of DocGo’s competitors are vertically integrated and can leverage this structure to their advantage. DocGo may fail to identify optimal service or geographic markets, focus its attention on suboptimal service or geographic markets or fail to execute an appropriate business model in certain service or geographic markets. DocGo’s competitors may develop new services or technologies that are superior to DocGo’s, develop more efficient or effective methods of providing services or adapt more quickly, efficiently or effectively than DocGo does to new technologies and opportunities. DocGo’s competitors may be positioned to provide better service or influence customer requirements, or more quickly respond to changing customer requirements, and thereby establish stronger customer relationships. DocGo’s competitors may offer their services at lower prices because, among other things, they possess the ability to provide similar services more efficiently, as part of a bundle with other services or generally at a lower cost. These pricing pressures could require DocGo to lower its prices to at or below its costs, requiring DocGo to sacrifice margins or incur losses. Alternatively, DocGo may choose to forgo entering certain markets or exit others, which would limit its growth and competitive reach. Any failure by DocGo to compete or to generally maintain and improve its competitive position could adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations.

DocGo’s revenue would be adversely affected if it loses some or all of its business under existing contracts.

A significant portion of DocGo’s revenue growth has historically resulted from increases in the business and related fees it collects under existing contracts and the addition of new contracts. DocGo’s contracts with healthcare providers and other customers generally have terms of one to three years and most of its contracts are terminable by either of the parties upon notice of as little as 30 days. Many of the pandemic-specific testing and vaccination contracts have much shorter terms, as little as a number of weeks or months, and there is no certainty these revenue streams can be sustained at existing levels, regardless of whether the pandemic is brought under control. Even if DocGo has an existing contract with a healthcare provider it does not create any exclusive relationship and even if DocGo is given preferred status, the customer often still does business with one or more of DocGo’s competitors. For example, execution under DocGo’s medical transportation services contracts requires that an ambulance or other necessary fleet vehicle be available and within a certain proximity and the time of need and, if one is not, the customer will seek alternative options. Furthermore, certain of DocGo’s contracts will expire during each fiscal period, and DocGo may be required to seek renewal of these contracts through a formal bidding process that often requires written responses to a request for proposal. Even if DocGo is successful in renewing the contract, it may contain terms that are not as favorable to DocGo as its current contracts. There can be no assurances that DocGo will successfully retain its existing contracts and any loss of contracts or reduction in services provided thereunder or under any renewal would have a material adverse effect on DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

DocGo’s reliance on government contracts could adversely affect its business.

While DocGo’s government contract work historically represented a small portion of its revenue, this work has recently increased substantially, representing approximately 7.3% and 65.1% of DocGo’s revenue for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2021, respectively, and maintaining and continuing to grow this revenue stream is an important part of DocGo’s growth strategy. However, government contract work is subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Only eligible parties can bid on and service most government contracts, which requires DocGo to comply with various statutes, rules, regulations and other governmental policies, including those related to wages, benefits, overtime, working conditions, equal employment opportunity, affirmative action and drug testing. If DocGo fails to comply with any of these requirements it may be suspended or debarred from government work or subject to various administrative sanctions and civil and criminal penalties and fines. Government contract work subjects DocGo to government audits, investigations, and proceedings, which can cause similar results if it is determined that a statute, rule, regulation, policy or contractual provision has been violated. Audits can also lead to adjustments to the amount of contract costs DocGo believes are reimbursable or the ultimate amount DocGo may be paid under the agreement.

Additionally, governments are typically under no obligation to maintain funding at any specific level, and funds for government programs can be eliminated with little or no notice. As a result, contracts with government agencies may only be partially funded or may be terminated, and DocGo may not realize all of the potential revenue from those contracts. Government contracts typically can be paused or canceled entirely at any time, in whole or in part, for the government’s convenience or for default with little or no prior notice. Under these circumstances, the contractor typically receives payment only for the lesser of the work completed or the amount authorized under the contract, but not the anticipated revenue and profit that would have been earned had the contract been completed. A temporary stoppage or delay or the complete cancellation of a project can create inefficiencies, such as leaving portions of DocGo’s fleet idle for a significant period of time, cause DocGo to lose some or all of its investment in the project or result in financial and other damages that DocGo may not be able to recover from the government. The timing of project awards, including expansions of existing projects, is also unpredictable and can involve complex and lengthy negotiations and competitive bidding processes. Other risks associated with government contracting include more extended collection cycles and heightened or unlimited indemnification obligations. Any failure to maintain and grow DocGo’s government contract revenues for one or more of these or any other reasons could adversely affect DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

A significant portion of our recent revenue growth is derived from a small number of large customers.

A significant portion of our revenues and income growth in 2021 was derived from a from a limited number of customers. For the year ended December 31, 2021, one customer accounted for approximately 26% of total sales, while another customer accounted for approximately 24% of sales. One of these customers is a public benefit corporation and the other is a municipality with separate contracts with several of its agencies and departments. Services are provided under different contracts with the various independent agencies of the municipality and are not guaranteed and are terminable at will by the particular agency. However, termination of any one of those particular contracts does not necessarily indicate a greater likelihood of termination of any of the municipality’s other contracts, as these contracts are awarded on a project basis, with each project running independently of the others. We cannot assure you that this customer or other large customers will continue to do business with us on terms or at rates currently in effect, or will not elect to do business with our competitors or perform their own services themselves. The loss of one of our top customers, if not offset by revenues from new or other existing customers, would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

DocGo’s labor costs are significant and any inability to control those costs could adversely affect its business.

Labor costs are DocGo’s largest fixed cost, representing approximately 25.1% and 59.9% of its 2021 and 2020 revenues, respectively. DocGo competes with other healthcare providers in attracting these professionals, including EMTs, paramedics and nurses, to support its operations. In some markets, the lack of availability of clinical personnel has become a significant operating issue facing all healthcare providers. This shortage may require DocGo to continue to enhance wages and benefits to recruit and retain qualified personnel or to identify and contract with more expensive temporary personnel. DocGo also depends on the available labor pool of technology-skilled workers in certain of the markets in which it operates.

If DocGo’s labor costs increase, it may not be able to raise rates to offset these increased costs. Because a significant percentage of DocGo’s revenue consists of fixed, prospective payments, its ability to pass along increased labor costs is limited. In particular, if labor costs rise at an annual rate greater than its revenues, DocGo’s results of operations and cash flows will likely be adversely affected.

Any union activity that may occur within DocGo’s workforce in the future could contribute to increased labor costs. Certain proposed changes in federal labor laws and the National Labor Relations Board’s modification of its election procedures could increase the likelihood of employee unionization attempts. Although none of DocGo’s employees are currently represented by a collective bargaining agreement, to the extent a significant portion of its employee base unionizes, it is possible DocGo’s labor costs could increase materially. DocGo’s failure to recruit and retain qualified healthcare professionals, or to control labor costs, could have a material adverse effect on DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

DocGo’s inability to collect on its customer receivables or unfavorable shifts in payor mix could adversely affect its business.

The general practice in DocGo’s industry is to provide medical services in advance of payment and, in many cases, prior to any assessment of the patient’s ability to pay. DocGo ultimately bills a number of different payors, including private insurance, Medicare and Medicaid, the healthcare provider or facility and self-pay patients. These different payors typically have different billing, coding, documentation and other compliance requirements that DocGo must satisfy and any procedural deficiencies or incorrect or incomplete information could result in delays or partial or complete non-payment for the services DocGo rendered. Changes in payor mix, particularly those that increase the percentage of patients covered by lower paying government programs as compared to private insurance or that increase the percentage of self-pay patients, can reduce the amount DocGo receives for its services and adversely affect DocGo’s ability to collect on its receivables. The ability to bill and collect on certain accounts may also be limited by statutory, regulatory and investigatory initiatives such as restrictions on charges for out-of-network services or by private lawsuits, including those directed at healthcare charges and collection practices for uninsured and underinsured patients. Other factors that can adversely affect DocGo’s billing and collection efforts include general economic conditions, disputes between payors as to which party is responsible for payment, variation in coverage for similar services among various payors and the ability of individual patients to pay. In addition, DocGo recently internalized its billing and collection functions, services that were historically provided by third parties. Any transition of this nature carries significant risks and uncertainties and the failure of these departments to operate efficiently and effectively could cause periodic or prolonged disruptions to DocGo’s billing and collection efforts or create other unanticipated inefficiencies. These and other risks and uncertainties that impact DocGo’s ability to timely bill and collect on its receivables or the amount DocGo can charge for its services could adversely affect DocGo’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

DocGo may not accurately assess the costs it will incur under new revenue opportunities.

DocGo must accurately assess the costs it will incur in providing services in order to realize adequate profit margins and otherwise meet its financial and strategic objectives, particularly with respect to the expansion of its telehealth business. Increasing pressures from healthcare payors to restrict or reduce reimbursement rates at a time when the costs of providing medical services continue to increase make assessing the costs associated with the pricing of new contracts, as well as maintenance of existing contracts, and pricing new services that DocGo has not previously offered, more difficult. Starting new contracts and service offerings may also negatively impact cash flow as DocGo absorbs various expenses before it is able to bill and collect revenue associated with the new contracts or services. In addition, integrating new contracts, particularly those in new geographic locations, could prove more costly, and could require more management time, than DocGo anticipates. Any failure to accurately predict costs or to negotiate an adequate profit margin could have a material adverse effect on DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

DocGo may enter into a large-scale deployment of resources in response to a national emergency as a subcontractor to FEMA, which may adversely affect DocGo’s business.

DocGo does not believe that a FEMA deployment would adversely affect its ability to service its customers. DocGo is not contractually obligated to respond to FEMA requests. However, if management elects to participate, any significant FEMA deployment requires significant management attention and could reduce DocGo’s ability to pursue other opportunities and to pursue geographic expansion and its growth strategies, which could have an adverse effect on DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

DocGo may face litigation and other risks as a result of Motion’s restatement of its historical financial statements and related matters.

Motion previously accounted for its outstanding Public Warrants and Private Warrants as components of equity instead of as derivative liabilities. The Warrant Agreement governing the warrants includes a provision that provides for potential changes to the settlement amounts dependent upon the characteristics of the holder of the warrant. Upon review of the “Staff Statement on Accounting and Reporting Considerations for Warrants Issued by Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)” promulgated by the SEC on April 12, 2021 (the “SEC Staff Statement”), Motion’s management further evaluated the Public Warrants and Private Warrants under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Subtopic 815-40, Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity. ASC Section 815-40-15 addresses equity versus liability treatment and classification of equity-linked financial instruments, including warrants, and states that a warrant may be classified as a component of equity only if, among other things, the warrant is indexed to the issuer’s common stock. Based on management’s evaluation, Motion’s audit committee, in consultation with management, concluded that the Public Warrants and Private Warrants are not indexed to Motion’s common stock. As a result, Motion reclassified the Public Warrants and Private Warrants as derivative liabilities. Under this accounting treatment, Motion was required to measure the fair value of the Public Warrants and Private Warrants at the end of each reporting period and recognize changes in the fair value from the prior period in Motion’s operating results for the current period.

As a result of the foregoing matters, DocGo may become subject to additional risks and uncertainties, including, among others, unanticipated costs for accounting and legal fees, the increased possibility of legal proceedings, shareholder lawsuits, governmental agency investigations, and inquiries by Nasdaq or other regulatory bodies, which could cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information and could subject DocGo to civil or criminal penalties, shareholder class actions or derivative actions. DocGo could face monetary judgments, penalties or other sanctions that could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations and could cause our stock price to decline. If any such actions occur, they will, regardless of the outcome, consume a significant amount of management’s time and attention and may result in additional legal, accounting, insurance and other costs. If DocGo does not prevail in any such proceedings, DocGo could be required to pay damages or settlement costs.

DocGo is an “emerging growth company” and it cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make the Common Stock less attractive to investors.

DocGo is an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act. As an emerging growth company, DocGo is only required to provide two years of audited financial statements and only two years of related selected financial data and management discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations disclosure. In addition, DocGo is not required to obtain auditor attestation of its reporting on internal control over financial reporting, has reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation and is not required to hold non-binding advisory votes on executive compensation. In addition, the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. This allows an emerging growth company to delay the adoption of these accounting standards until they would otherwise apply to private companies. DocGo has elected to take advantage of such extended transition period. DocGo cannot predict whether investors will find Common Stock to be less attractive as a result of its reliance on these exemptions. If some investors find the Common Stock to be less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for Common Stock and the price of the Common Stock may be more volatile than the historical trading market and price of Motion’s Class A Common Stock.

DocGo will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of: (i) the end of the fiscal year in which DocGo has total annual gross revenue of $1.07 billion; (ii) the last day of DocGo’s fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the Initial Public Offering (or December 31, 2025); (iii) the date on which DocGo issues more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the preceding three-year period; or (iv) the end of the fiscal year in which the market value of the Common Stock held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of its most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

Further, there is no guarantee that the exemptions available under the JOBS Act will result in significant savings. To the extent that DocGo chooses not to use exemptions from various reporting requirements under the JOBS Act, it will incur additional compliance costs, which may impact DocGo’s financial condition.

Risks Related to DocGo’s Limited Operating History

DocGo’s limited operating history may make it difficult to evaluate its business, which may be unsuccessful.

DocGo has a limited operating history since its inception in 2015. As such, there is limited information on which to base an evaluation of its business and prospects. DocGo’s operations are subject to all of the risks inherent in the establishment of a recently formed business and its success may be limited by expenses, difficulties, inefficiencies, complications and delays, including the need for additional financing, challenges with the successful commercialization of its services and its geographic expansion, market and customer acceptance of its services and technologies, unexpected issues with federal or state regulatory authorities, competition from larger operations, uncertain intellectual property protection, fluctuations in expenses and dependence on corporate partners and collaborators. Any failure to successfully address these and other risks and uncertainties commonly associated with early stage companies could seriously harm DocGo’s business and prospects, and it may not succeed given the challenges it faces in the markets in which it operates or may choose to expand in the future. Additionally, the idea of providing healthcare transportation services with significant reliance on a mobile platform is novel, the telehealth industry is nascent and still evolving and there are no well-established companies offering the “last-mile” telehealth solutions that DocGo offers, all of which carry its own unique risks, including market and consumer acceptance and adoption. Any evaluation of DocGo’s business and its prospects must be considered in light of these factors and the other risks and uncertainties frequently encountered by companies in this early stage of development. No assurance can be given that DocGo will successfully navigate these issues or implement any of its growth strategies in a timely or effective manner, which would negatively impact DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Much of DocGo’s revenue, employee and operations growth has occurred during recent years, which has been partially driven by significant COVID-related impacts. For example, the Company estimates that COVID testing relating revenue for 2021 was approximately $110 million Our ability to forecast our future operating results is limited and subject to a number of uncertainties, including our ability to predict revenue and expense levels, and plan for and model future growth. These uncertainties are exacerbated by the effects of the Covid-19 pandemic.

DocGo has a history of losses, expects its operating expenses to increase significantly in the foreseeable future and may not achieve or sustain profitability.

Prior to 2021, when DocGo recorded $19.2 million in net income, DocGo had experienced a net loss in each year since inception, including a net loss of $14.8 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. As of December 31, 2021, DocGo had an accumulated deficit of $63.6 million. While DocGo has been able to generate revenues and believes its business strategy provides for predictable revenue streams in future periods, the business may not be able to increase revenues in future periods and may resume incurring net losses for some time as it continues to grow. It is difficult for DocGo to predict its future results of operations, and it expects its operating expenses to increase significantly over the next several years as it continues to expand its operations and infrastructure, acquire additional vehicles, hire additional personnel, make and integrate future acquisitions and invest in technology and research and development. In addition to the costs to grow its business, DocGo also expects to incur significant additional legal, accounting and other expenses as a newly public company. If DocGo fails to increase its revenue to offset the increases in its operating expenses, DocGo may not achieve or sustain profitability in the future.

If DocGo is unable to effectively manage its growth, its financial performance and future prospects will be adversely affected.

Since DocGo’s inception in 2015, it has experienced rapid growth in the United States and more recently, internationally in the United Kingdom, and it expects to continue to grow in the future. For example, DocGo’s revenues have grown from $30.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2017 to $318.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2021, and DocGo’s employee base has grown to more than 2,900 in just over four years. This growth has placed, and may continue to place, significant strain on DocGo’s management, its operational and financial infrastructure and its controls and procedures, which may not be adequate to support this growth or sustain further expansion in the future.

DocGo’s ability to effectively manage its growth has required and will continue to require it to expand and improve its operational and financial infrastructure, including its controls and procedures, and to retain, attract, train, motivate and manage employees, including qualified medical professionals, operations personnel and financial and accounting staff. Additionally, DocGo has needed to and will continue to need to integrate new technologies and acquisitions into its existing business and establish consistent policies across regions and functions. Achieving these goals has required DocGo to commit substantial financial, operational and technical resources, and DocGo expects these demands to persist, and very likely may increase, as it continues to grow in the future.

This expansion and increasing complexity of DocGo’s business has placed significant strain on its operations, personnel and systems and further growth in the future could restrict DocGo’s ability to develop and improve its operational, financial and management controls and enhance its reporting systems and procedures. If DocGo is not able to expand its operations and attract, train and retain additional qualified personnel in an efficient manner, DocGo’s operations and services will be adversely affected and its customers may choose one or more of its competitors. Additionally, DocGo’s failure to maintain or upgrade its technology infrastructure effectively to support its growth or otherwise maintain its technological competitive advantage could result in unanticipated system disruptions, slow response times, or an unsatisfactory customer experience. An inability to maintain effective management, financial and reporting systems, controls and procedures could adversely affect DocGo’s ability to provide timely and accurate financial information or result in a misstatement of account balances or disclosures. If DocGo is unable to effectively manage its recent or future growth, its operations may suffer, which would adversely affect DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to Technology

DocGo’s business depends on numerous complex information systems and any failure to successfully maintain these systems could adversely affect its business.

DocGo depends on complex, integrated information systems and standardized procedures for operational and financial information and its billing operations. DocGo may not have the necessary resources to enhance existing information systems or implement new systems where necessary to handle its volume and changing needs. For example, DocGo recently implemented new information systems and processes in connection with internalizing its billing and collection functions, services that were historically provided by third parties, and any failure of these systems could adversely affect DocGo’s ability to submit and collect claims in a timely manner or at all. DocGo also uses the development and implementation of sophisticated and specialized technology such as its platform to differentiate its services from its competitors and improve DocGo’s profitability.

DocGo may experience unanticipated delays, complications and expenses in implementing, integrating and operating its systems. Any system disruption can adversely affect DocGo’s ability to properly allocate resources and process billing information in a timely manner, which could result in customer dissatisfaction and delayed cash flow. While DocGo has disaster recovery systems and business continuity plans in place, any disruptions in its disaster recovery systems or the failure of these systems to operate as expected could, depending on the magnitude of the problem, limit DocGo’s capacity to effectively monitor and control its operations. The failure to successfully implement and maintain operational, financial and billing information systems could have an adverse effect on DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

DocGo’s dependence on the performance of its innovative platform and reliability of the Internet and similar infrastructures could adversely affect its business.

DocGo’s technology platform is one of its primary competitive advantages and its business depends in significant part on the performance and reliability of the Internet and other mobile infrastructures and communication systems to ensure access to and the functionality of its platform. Disruptions in Internet infrastructure or GPS signals or the failure of telecommunications network operators to provide DocGo with the bandwidth it needs to operate its platform and provide its services, whether as a result of power outage, telecommunications delay or failure, security breach or otherwise, could result in delays or interruptions and interfere with the speed and availability of DocGo’s platform. DocGo may also operate in jurisdictions that provide limited Internet connectivity, particularly as it expands into more rural areas and internationally. Internet access and access to a mobile device are frequently provided by companies with significant market power that could take actions that degrade, disrupt or increase the cost to access DocGo’s platform. In addition, DocGo has no control over the costs of the services provided by national telecommunications operators and if mobile Internet access fees or other charges to Internet users increase, consumer traffic may decrease. Any such failure in or disruptions to Internet or mobile device accessibility, even for a short period of time, could adversely affect DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

DocGo’s platform is highly technical and its failure to operate effectively could adversely affect DocGo’s business.

DocGo’s business and its competitive advantage are dependent upon its ability to maintain operation and functionality of its platform, which is a complex system composed of many interoperating components and incorporates both proprietary and open-source software. The software and other components used in the platform may now or in the future contain undetected errors, bugs, vulnerabilities or limitations, some of which may only be discovered after the code has been released. These types of errors, misconfigurations of its systems, and unintended interactions between systems or other limitations could result in platform downtime impacting the availability of DocGo’s services. In addition, updates or expansions to DocGo’s platform of the software it relies upon may inadvertently cause interruptions in the availability or functionality of the technology. DocGo also relies on co-located data centers for the operation of its platform and, if one or more of these data centers fail, DocGo’s platform may not operate effectively or at all. If sustained for more than a brief period of time or repeated, these outages or other failures could, among other things, reduce the utility or attractiveness of DocGo’s platform to users, expose DocGo to liability if a patient’s health is adversely affected, result in negative publicity or damage DocGo’s reputation, cause DocGo to fail to comply with certain federal, state or foreign reporting obligations, and have a material adverse effect on DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

DocGo relies on third-party mobile operating systems and application marketplaces to make its platform available and any failure to effectively operate across these operating systems and within these marketplaces could adversely affect DocGo’s business.

One of the most important features of DocGo’s platform is its broad interoperability with and availability on a range of devices, operating systems and third-party applications, including iOS and Android and their respective application marketplaces. DocGo does not have any control over these third-party operating systems and technologies or their respective marketplaces and there can be no assurances that these third parties will maintain their current structures. DocGo may also not be successful in developing or maintaining relationships with key participants in the mobile industry and there is no certainty that one or more will not change the fees to list DocGo’s platform for download. Further, as new mobile devices and mobile platforms are released, there is no guarantee that all mobile devices will continue to support DocGo’s platform or effectively roll out any updates. Any changes in these technologies, operating systems or marketplaces or the emergence of new alternatives that degrade the functionality of DocGo’s platform, increase the cost of using DocGo’s platform or make DocGo’s platform more difficult to access or otherwise unavailable could have a material adverse effect on DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

DocGo’s reliance on third-party service providers could adversely affect its business.

DocGo’s success depends in part on its integrations and relationships with third-party service providers, particularly third-party providers of technology related services. DocGo also uses a combination of third-party cloud computing services and co-located data centers in the United States and in the United Kingdom, including those of Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure, over which DocGo has no control. These third-party operations, services and co-located data centers may experience disruptions, including break-ins, computer viruses, denial-of-service attacks and other misconduct and may be vulnerable to damage or interruption from power loss, telecommunications failures, fires, floods, earthquakes and similar events. DocGo’s systems do not provide complete redundancy of data storage or processing, and as a result, the occurrence of these or other similar events, a decision by the third-party service providers to cease providing a service or close a co-located data center without adequate notice, or other unanticipated problems may result in DocGo’s inability to service data reliably or require it to find an alternative or migrate its data to a new on-premises data center or cloud computing service. Additionally, the contracts pursuant to which the service is provided, including the co-located data center facility agreements, can be of limited durations, and the third party generally has no obligation to renew their agreements with DocGo, whether on commercially reasonable terms or at all. These agreements can often be terminated on short notice. DocGo may not be able to easily switch to another service or cloud or data center provider in the event of any disruptions or interference to the services it uses, and even if it does, other providers are subject to the same risks and may not be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Any need to change a service provider or find a new cloud or data center could be time consuming and costly and may result in the loss of data and significantly interrupt the functionality of DocGo’s platform and its ability to provide its services. Further, any negative publicity related to any of DocGo’s third-party partners, including any publicity related to quality standards or safety concerns, could similarly affect DocGo’s reputation and brand, and could potentially lead to increased regulatory or litigation exposure. Any of the foregoing risks related to DocGo’s reliance on third-party services providers could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

DocGo’s reliance on third-party software, including open-source software, could adversely affect its business.

DocGo’s success depends in part on its integrations and relationships with third-party software providers and expects that DocGo will continue to do so in the future in connection with the development and expansion of DocGo’s offerings and technologies. For example, DocGo’s use of Google Waze for the mapping and traffic function is critical to the functionality of its ShareLink technology. DocGo does not believe that an alternative mapping solution exists that can provide the scale and functionality that DocGo requires to offer these features in all of the markets in which it operates or may expand. DocGo also relies on third-party encryption and authentication technologies licensed from third parties that are designed to securely transmit electronic medical records and other personal patient information. DocGo uses third-party software internally as well, including for communication purposes. If these third parties cease to provide access to the software that DocGo uses, if it is not available on terms that DocGo believes to be reasonable, or it is not available in the most current version, DocGo may be required to seek comparable software from other sources, which may be more expensive or inferior, or may not be available at all. Some of DocGo’s technology partners may also take actions which disrupt the utility of the software to DocGo or the interoperability of DocGo’s platform with their own products or services, or exert strong business influence on DocGo’s ability to and the terms on which it operates and distributes its platform. Additionally, third-party services and products are constantly evolving, and DocGo may not be able to modify its operations or platform to assure its compatibility with that of other third parties following development changes. DocGo’s third-party licenses are typically non-exclusive and its competitors may obtain the right to use any of the technology covered by these licenses to compete directly with it. If any of DocGo’s technology partners limits access or modifies their products, standards or terms of use in a manner that degrades the functionality or performance of DocGo’s platform, that is otherwise unsatisfactory or adverse to DocGo, or that gives preferential treatment to competitive products or services, DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

DocGo also uses third-party open-source software in connection with its business and the development and operation of its platform, which carries its own unique risks. From time to time, companies that use third-party open-source software have faced claims of ownership or challenging the use of such open-source software and their compliance with the terms of the applicable open source license. Some open source licenses require end users who distribute or make available across a network software and services that include open source software to make available all or part of such software, which in some circumstances could include valuable proprietary code, meaning DocGo’s ability to protect its intellectual property rights in such software source code may be limited or lost entirely and DocGo would not be able to prevent competitors or others from using the code and developing competing technologies. While DocGo employs practices designed to monitor its compliance with third-party open-source software licenses and to protect its valuable proprietary source code, DocGo has not run a complete open-source license review and may inadvertently use third-party open source software in a manner that exposes it to claims of non-compliance with the applicable license terms, including claims for infringement of intellectual property rights or for breach of contract. Furthermore, there is an increasing number of different types of open-source software licenses, most of which have not been tested in a court of law, resulting in a significant absence of guidance regarding the proper legal interpretation of these licenses. If DocGo was to receive a claim of non-compliance with the terms of any of its open-source licenses, it may be required to publicly release some or all of its proprietary source code or expend substantial time and resources to re-engineer some or all of its software. Use of open-source software may also present additional security risks because the public availability of such software may make it easier for hackers and other third parties to determine how to compromise DocGo’s platform. Any of the foregoing or other risks related to the use of open-source software could have an adverse effect on DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Security breaches, loss of data and other disruptions could compromise sensitive business, customer or patient information or prevent DocGo from accessing critical information and expose it to liability, which could adversely affect DocGo’s business.

DocGo is highly dependent on information technology networks and systems, including on-site systems, managed data center systems and cloud-based computing center system, to securely process, transmit and store sensitive data and information, such as protected health information (“PHI”) and other types of personal data or personally identifiable information (“PII”) relating to its employees, customers, patients and other confidential or proprietary business information. Computer malware, viruses, spamming, and phishing attacks have become more prevalent, have occurred on DocGo’s systems in the past, and may occur on DocGo’s systems in the future. Various other factors may also cause system failures, including power outages, catastrophic events, inadequate or ineffective redundancy, issues with upgrading or creating new systems or platforms, flaws in third-party software or services, errors or intentional acts by DocGo’s employees or third-party service providers, or breaches in the security of these systems or platforms. These and other issues can create system disruptions, shutdowns or unauthorized access to or disclosure or modifications of such sensitive data or information, including PHI or PII. DocGo also utilizes third-party service providers for important aspects of the collection, storage, processing and transmission of this sensitive information and therefore is dependent on these third parties to similarly manage cybersecurity risks.

Because of the sensitivity of the PHI, other PII and other sensitive information DocGo and its service providers collect, store, transmit, and otherwise process, the security of DocGo’s technology platform and other aspects of its services, including those provided or facilitated by DocGo’s third-party service providers, are important to DocGo’s operations and business strategy. DocGo takes certain administrative, physical and technological safeguards to address these risks, such as by requiring contractors and other third-party service providers who handle this PHI, other PII and other sensitive information to enter into agreements that contractually obligate them to use reasonable efforts to safeguard such PHI, other PII, and other sensitive information. DocGo is also in the process of upgrading its systems to be ISO 27001 and Service Organization Controls (SOC) 2 compliant. Measures taken to protect DocGo’s systems, those of its contractors or third-party service providers, or the PHI, other PII, or other sensitive information DocGo or contractors or third-party service providers process or maintain, may not adequately protect DocGo from the risks associated with the collection, storage, processing and transmission of such sensitive data and information. Additionally, updates or upgrades to systems, including those currently underway with respect to ISO 27001 and SOC 2 compliance, are time-consuming and effective, may not operate as designed and could create new inefficiencies or vulnerabilities. DocGo may also be required to expend significant capital and other resources to address problems caused by security breaches. Despite DocGo’s implementation of security measures, cyberattacks are becoming more sophisticated and frequent. As a result, DocGo or its third-party service providers may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate protective measures. If DocGo is unable to earn and maintain necessary certifications, including ISO 27001 and SOC 2 compliance, it could result in reputational harm, customer churn and adversely affect DocGo’s ability to provide its services.

A security breach or privacy violation that leads to disclosure or unauthorized use or modification of, or that prevents access to or otherwise impacts the confidentiality, security, or integrity of, patient information, including PHI or other PII, or other sensitive information DocGo or its contractors or third-party service providers maintain or otherwise process, could harm DocGo’s reputation, compel it to comply with breach notification laws, cause it to incur significant costs for remediation, fines, penalties, notification to individuals and for measures intended to repair or replace systems or technology and to prevent future occurrences, potential increases in insurance premiums, and require DocGo to verify the accuracy of database contents, resulting in increased costs or loss of revenue. If DocGo is unable to prevent or mitigate such security breaches or privacy violations or implement satisfactory remedial measures, or if it is perceived that DocGo has been unable to do so, its operations or the functionality of its innovative technology could be disrupted, it may be unable to provide access to its systems, and it could suffer a loss of customers, and it may as a result suffer loss of reputation, adverse impacts on customer, consumer and investor confidence, financial loss, governmental investigations or other actions, regulatory or contractual penalties, and other claims and liability. In addition, security breaches and other inappropriate access to, or acquisition or processing of, information can be difficult to detect, and any delay in identifying such incidents or in providing any notification of such incidents may lead to increased harm.

Any such breach or interruption of DocGo’s systems or those of any of its third-party service providers could compromise DocGo’s networks or data security processes and sensitive information could be made inaccessible or could be accessed by unauthorized parties, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. Any such interruption in access, improper access, disclosure or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability under laws and regulations that protect the privacy of member information or other personal information, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009 (“HITECH”), and their implementing regulations and related rules (collectively, “HIPAA”), and regulatory penalties. See the section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K statement/consent solicitation statement/prospectus titled “Description of DocGo’s Business — Regulatory Matters.” Unauthorized access, loss or dissemination could also disrupt DocGo’s operations, including its ability to perform its services, access customer and patient health information, collect, process, and prepare company financial information, and provide information about DocGo’s current and future services. Any such breach could also result in the compromise of DocGo’s trade secrets and other proprietary information, which could adversely affect DocGo’s business and competitive position. While DocGo maintains insurance covering certain security and privacy damages and claim expenses, it may not carry insurance or maintain coverage sufficient to compensate for all liability and in any event, insurance coverage would not address the reputational damage that could result from a security incident.

As of the date of this filing, DocGo has not been impacted by any security breaches to its technology platform, including its on-site systems, managed data center systems and cloud-based computing center system.

Other Risks Related to DocGo’s Business

DocGo depends on its key management personnel.

DocGo’s success depends to a significant degree upon the contributions of certain key management personnel including, but not limited to, its founder Stan Vashovsky and the other officers listed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. If any of DocGo’s key management personnel were to cease employment with it, DocGo’s operating results could suffer. DocGo’s ability to retain its key management personnel or to attract suitable replacements should any member(s) of its management team leave is dependent on the culture the leadership team fosters and on the competitive nature of the employment market, particularly in a heavily regulated industry like that of DocGo. DocGo does not have key management life insurance that would provide it with proceeds in the event of death or disability of any of its key management personnel. The loss of services from key management personnel or any inability to find a suitable replacement should there be turnover at those positions could materially and adversely affect DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

DocGo’s inability to successfully recruit, train and retain qualified healthcare professionals could adversely affect its business.

The pool of qualified healthcare professionals, including EMTs, paramedics, LPNs and nurses, available to staff DocGo’s broad spectrum of contracts and customer needs is limited and DocGo invests significant resources to attract, train and retain these professionals. There is a relatively high rate of turnover in healthcare professional positions and, with DocGo’s expansion, its requirements in these positions have increased significantly. A significant number of employees have joined DocGo in recent years as it has grown and DocGo’s success is dependent on its ability to maintain and instill its culture, align its talent with its business needs, engage its employees and inspire them to be open to change, to innovate and to maintain a customer-driven focus when delivering its services. As such, DocGo’s ability to recruit, train and retain a sufficient number of qualified healthcare professionals has a direct impact on its operations.

DocGo has, from time to time, experienced, and it expects to continue to experience, difficulty in hiring and retaining healthcare professionals with appropriate qualifications, a difficulty that is amplified by the scope of the geographic and demographic diversity of the markets in which DocGo operates or may expand into in the future. Moreover, DocGo’s customers, including the healthcare providers with which it partners, have increasingly demanded a greater degree of specialized skills, training and experience in the healthcare professionals providing services under their contracts, which also decreases the number of healthcare professionals who may be qualified to staff certain of DocGo’s contracts. DocGo competes with other companies to recruit and retain these qualified healthcare professionals, including DocGo’s direct competitors, government and private emergency and first responders as well as healthcare providers, including DocGo’s partners and customers. Competition to fill these positions can be even greater in certain geographic regions, including more rural or economically depressed areas. In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly increased the demand for healthcare professionals in all regards, which makes it more difficult for DocGo to attract and retain the necessary qualified professionals. If DocGo is unable to attract, train and retain highly qualified healthcare professions, or if turnover rates are higher than it anticipates, it could have an adverse effect on DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

DocGo’s failure to protect or enforce its intellectual property rights could adversely affect its business.

DocGo’s success is dependent in part upon protecting its intellectual property rights and technology, including code, information, data, processes and other forms of information, know-how and technology. DocGo relies on a combination of patents, copyrights, trademarks, service marks, trade secret laws and contractual restrictions to establish and protect its intellectual property. DocGo also enters into confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with its employees and consultants and enters into confidentiality agreements with certain of its third-party providers and strategic partners. However, these and other steps DocGo takes to protect its intellectual property may not be sufficient or effective.

Many intellectual property protections do not prevent competitors or others from independently developing technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to DocGo’s offerings. Further, it may still be possible for competitors and other unauthorized third parties to copy DocGo’s technology and use its proprietary information to create or enhance competing platforms, solutions and services. DocGo also enters into strategic relationships, joint development and other similar agreements with third parties where intellectual property arising from such relationships may be jointly owned or may be transferred or licensed to the counterparty. These arrangements may limit DocGo’s ability to protect, maintain, enforce or commercialize such intellectual property rights, including requiring agreement with or payment to the joint development partners before protecting, maintaining, licensing or initiating enforcement of such intellectual property rights, and may allow such joint development partners to register, maintain, enforce or license such intellectual property rights in a manner that may affect the value of the jointly owned intellectual property or DocGo’s ability to compete in the market. As DocGo expands its international activities, its exposure to unauthorized use, copying, transfer and disclosure of proprietary information will likely increase as the laws of some countries do not provide the same level of intellectual property protection as do the laws of the United States and effective intellectual property protections may not be available or may be limited and harder to enforce in some jurisdictions.

DocGo may be required to spend significant resources in order to monitor and protect its intellectual property rights, and some violations may be difficult or impossible to detect. And, even if DocGo does detect violations of its intellectual property rights, it may need to engage in litigation or other actions to enforce its rights. Any enforcement efforts, and litigation in particular, could be costly, time-consuming and distracting to management and could result in the impairment or loss of portions of DocGo’s intellectual property. DocGo’s efforts to enforce its intellectual property rights may also be met with defenses, counterclaims and countersuits attacking the validity and enforceability of its intellectual property rights. DocGo’s inability to protect its proprietary technology against unauthorized copying or use, as well as any costly litigation or extensive enforcement activities, could impair the functionality of DocGo’s platform, delay introductions of enhancements to the platform, result in DocGo’s substituting inferior or more costly technologies into its platform, harm DocGo’s reputation or brand and otherwise have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Claims by others that DocGo infringed their proprietary technology or other intellectual property rights could adversely affect DocGo’s business.

From time to time third parties may assert claims of infringement of intellectual property rights against DocGo. In addition, third parties have sent DocGo correspondence regarding various allegations of intellectual property infringement. DocGo incorporates technology from third parties into its platform and, as such, cannot be certain that these licensors are not infringing the intellectual property rights of others or that the suppliers and licensors have sufficient rights to the technology in all jurisdictions in which DocGo may operate. As DocGo gains an increasingly higher public profile, DocGo expects the possibility of these and other types of intellectual property rights claims against it will grow. Although DocGo believes that it has meritorious defenses, there can be no assurance that DocGo will be successful in defending against these and future allegations or in reaching a business resolution that is acceptable to DocGo.

Many potential litigants, including some of DocGo’s competitors and patent-holding companies, have the ability to dedicate substantial resources to assert their intellectual property rights. Any claim of infringement by a third party, even those without merit, could be costly, time-consuming and a significant distraction to management. Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, DocGo could risk compromising its confidential information during this type of litigation. With respect to any intellectual property rights claim, DocGo may have to negotiate a license to continue operations found to be in violation of such rights, and these licenses may not be available on favorable or commercially reasonable terms or at all. DocGo may be required to pay substantial damages, royalties or other fees in connection with a claimant securing a judgment against it, DocGo may be subject to an injunction or other restrictions that prevent it from using the relevant intellectual property, or DocGo may determine it is prudent to agree to a settlement that restricts DocGo’s operations or its use of certain intellectual property, any of which could adversely affect DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

If DocGo is unable to successfully develop new offerings and technologies or adapt to rapidly changing technology and industry standards or changes to regulatory requirements, DocGo’s business could be adversely affected.

Technology, including the mobile technologies DocGo utilizes on its innovative platform, is characterized by rapid change, evolving industry standards and changing regulatory requirements. This constant evolution may reduce the utility or effectiveness of DocGo’s technology or render its business model or platform noncompetitive or obsolete. DocGo’s continued success and growth depend in part upon its ability to anticipate these challenges and to innovate by enhancing its platform and other technologies and developing and successfully implementing updates and new features to keep pace with these ever-changing and increasingly sophisticated demands.

New technology introductions and platform updates can be complex and expensive as they require significant planning, design, development and testing. DocGo may find it difficult or costly to update its platform and its service offerings and to develop new services quickly enough to work effectively with new or changed technologies, to keep the pace with evolving industry standards or to meet customers’ needs. In addition, DocGo’s industry may be slow to accept DocGo’s use of technology because of, among other things, general unfamiliarity of healthcare providers with new technologies and the wide disparity of technology used in the industry, including with respect to electronic medical records. As a result, any new technologies or platform updates that DocGo may develop may not be successful for a number of years, if at all. If DocGo is unable to successfully develop new services or enhance or update its platform and existing services to meet these challenges, its business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.

DocGo’s marketing efforts to help grow its business, including its recent rebrand, may not be effective.

Promoting awareness of DocGo’s brand, innovative technology and services is important to its ability to grow its business and to attract and retain customers, and these efforts can be costly. DocGo believes that much of the growth in its business is in part attributable to its marketing initiatives. DocGo’s marketing initiatives may become increasingly expensive and generating a meaningful return on those initiatives may be difficult. Even if DocGo successfully increases revenue as a result of its paid marketing efforts, it may not offset the additional marketing expenses it incurs. Any factor that diminishes DocGo’s reputation or that of its brands, including adverse publicity or failing to meet the expectations of customers, could make it substantially more difficult for DocGo to attract new customers. If these marketing efforts are not successful, DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Additionally, in January 2021, the company rolled-out a new corporate name — DocGo — while continuing to use the Ambulnz brand for its healthcare transportation services. This process carries additional risk and requires time and expense. DocGo may lose customers if they do not respond favorably to the new brand or fail to recognize the new brand as a continuation of the same business and platform. DocGo may also lose potential new customers who may have been familiar with the company, but are not yet aware of DocGo. The change may also impede the company’s ability to attract new qualified personnel if candidates do not recognize the new name. The rebranding will also increase costs. Any unforeseen costs, lack of success or loss of current or potential new customers related to the corporate name change could adversely affect DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

DocGo could be subject to lawsuits for which it does not have sufficient reserves.

Healthcare providers and other participants in the healthcare industry have become subject to an increasing number of lawsuits alleging medical malpractice and related legal theories such as negligent hiring, supervision and credentialing. Similarly, healthcare transportation services can result in lawsuits related to vehicle collisions and personal injuries, patient care incidents or mistreatment and employee job-related injuries. Moreover, in the normal course of DocGo’s business, it is involved in lawsuits, claims, audits and investigations, including those arising out of its billing practices, employment disputes, contractual claims and other business disputes for which DocGo may have no insurance coverage, and which are not subject to actuarial estimates. Some of these lawsuits may involve large claim amounts and substantial defense costs.

Adverse outcomes with respect to litigation or any of these legal proceedings may result in significant settlement costs or judgments, penalties and fines, which may or may not be covered by DocGo’s existing insurance, or require DocGo to modify its services or require it to stop serving certain customers or geographies, all of which could negatively impact its existing business and its ability to grow. DocGo may also become subject to periodic audits, which would likely increase its regulatory compliance costs and may require it to change its business practices or the scope of its operations. Managing legal proceedings, litigation and audits, even if DocGo achieves favorable outcomes, is time-consuming and diverts management’s attention from DocGo’s day-to-day business. The outcome of these matters or future claims and disputes are difficult to predict and determining reserves for pending litigation and other legal, regulatory and audit matters requires significant judgment. There can be no assurance that DocGo’s expectations will prove correct, and even if these matters are resolved in its favor or without significant cash settlements, these matters, and the time and resources necessary to litigate or resolve them, could have a material effect on DocGo’s results of operations in the period when it identifies the matter, and could have a material adverse effect on DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

DocGo is subject to a variety of federal, state and local laws and regulatory regimes, including a variety of labor laws and regulations, and changes to or the failure to comply with these laws and regulations could adversely affect DocGo’s business.

DocGo is subject to various federal, state, and local laws and regulations including the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) and regulations promulgated by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), the U.S. Department of Labor and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. DocGo is also subject to a variety of federal and state employment and labor laws and regulations, including the Americans with Disabilities Act, the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, and other regulations related to working conditions, wage-hour pay, overtime pay, family leave, employee benefits, antidiscrimination, termination of employment, safety standards and other workplace regulations. Compliance with these and other applicable laws and regulations can be time-consuming and costly. Failure to properly adhere to these and other applicable laws and regulations could result in investigations, the imposition of penalties or adverse legal judgments by public or private plaintiffs. Changes to these laws and regulations can also increase costs and require DocGo to commit additional resources to compliance. For example, raising the federal minimum wage or the minimum wage within a state where DocGo has significant operations, which has been and continues to be a subject of ongoing discussions in Washington, D.C. and other U.S. state capitals, could significantly increase DocGo’s selling, general and administrative expenses. Changes to or any failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations. See also “— Risks Related to Healthcare Regulation.”

DocGo’s insurance coverage, including the reserves DocGo establishes with respect to its insurable losses, could adversely affect its business.

In connection with DocGo’s insurance programs, management establishes reserves for losses and related expenses within its self-insured retention limits, which represent estimates involving actuarial and statistical projections, at a given point in time, of DocGo’s expectations of the ultimate resolution and administration costs of losses it has incurred in respect of its liability risks. Insurance reserves inherently are subject to uncertainty. DocGo’s reserves are based on historical claims, demographic factors, industry trends, severity and exposure factors and other actuarial assumptions. The actuarial projections include studies of projected ultimate losses on an annual basis and provide quarterly updates to those projections. DocGo uses these actuarial estimates to determine appropriate reserves. DocGo’s reserves could be significantly affected if current and future occurrences differ from historical claim trends and expectations. While DocGo monitors claims closely when it estimates reserves, the complexity of the claims and the wide range of potential outcomes may hamper timely adjustments to the assumptions DocGo uses in these estimates. Actual losses and related expenses may deviate, individually and in the aggregate, from the reserve estimates reflected in DocGo’s consolidated financial statements. If DocGo determines that its estimated reserves are inadequate, it will be required to increase reserves at the time of the determination, which would reduce DocGo’s earnings in the period in which the deficiency is determined and could have a material adverse effect on DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Some of DocGo’s insurance coverage is through various third-party insurers. To the extent DocGo holds policies to cover certain groups of claims or relies on insurance coverage obtained by third parties to cover such claims, DocGo may still be responsible for losses. This could occur for a variety of reasons, including if DocGo or such third parties did not obtain sufficient insurance limits, did not buy an extended reporting period policy, where applicable, or the issuing insurance company is unable or unwilling to pay such claims. Furthermore, for DocGo’s losses that are insured or reinsured through commercial insurance companies, it is subject to the “credit risk” of those insurance companies. In addition, professional liability insurance is expensive and insurance premiums may increase significantly in the future, particularly as DocGo expands the geographies in which it does business. As a result, adequate professional liability insurance may not be available to it in the future at acceptable costs or at all. While DocGo believes its commercial insurance company providers are creditworthy, there can be no assurance that such insurance companies will remain so in the future, and any failure of DocGo’s insurance coverage to adequately cover any losses could have a material adverse effect on DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

DocGo is required to make capital expenditures in order to remain compliant and competitive.

DocGo’s capital expenditure requirements primarily relate to maintaining, growing and upgrading its vehicle fleet and medical equipment to serve its customers and remain competitive. The aging of DocGo’s vehicle fleet requires it to make regular capital expenditures, including to lease newer replacement vehicles, to maintain its current level of service. DocGo’s net capital expenditures totaled $4.7 million and $4.1 million in the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, representing acquisitions of property and equipment, less the proceeds from disposals of property and equipment. In addition, changing competitive conditions or the emergence of any significant advances in medical technology could require DocGo to invest significant capital in additional equipment or capacity in order to remain competitive. DocGo is also required to commit sufficient capital to acquiring the necessary infrastructure when it expands into new geographies. If DocGo is unable to fund any such investment or otherwise fail to invest in new vehicles, medical equipment or other infrastructure, its business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

DocGo’s international operations subject it to additional risks that could adversely affect its business.

DocGo currently provides healthcare transportation services in the United Kingdom and intends to further expand its operations and services internationally, which subjects DocGo to regulatory, economic, political and other events and uncertainties in these foreign jurisdictions. In addition to the risks discussed elsewhere herein that are common to DocGo’s operations more generally, DocGo faces additional risks specific to its international operations, including but not limited to:

Foreign operations bring increased complexity and the costs of managing or overseeing foreign operations, including adapting and localizing services or systems to specific regions and countries, can be material. Further, international operations carry inherent uncertainties regarding the effect of local or domestic actions, such as the unpredictable impact of the United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union (Brexit) and the uncertainty regarding how the agreements reached will operate, any of which could be material. International operations also carry financial risks such as those related to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and disparate tax laws. These and other risks related to DocGo’s existing or future foreign operations, or the associated costs or liabilities, could have a material adverse effect on DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

DocGo’s business could be materially and adversely affected by natural disasters, other catastrophic events, acts of war or terrorism, cybersecurity incidents, and/or other acts by third parties.

DocGo and its customers depend on the ability of its business to run smoothly, including the ability of its fleet of ambulances, which are often needed in times of emergency, to transport patients. Any material disruption caused by natural disasters, including, fires, floods, hurricanes, volcanoes, and earthquakes; power loss or shortages; environmental disasters; telecommunications or business information systems failures; acts of war or terrorism; viral outbreaks and other similar epidemics; cybersecurity incidents; and other actions by third parties and other similar disruptions could cause DocGo to lose critical data and services and otherwise adversely affect DocGo’s ability to conduct business. Even with disaster recovery arrangements, DocGo’s services could be interrupted and DocGo’s insurance coverage may not compensate it for losses that may occur in the wake of such events. If any disruption results in the destruction of some or all of DocGo’s fleet, significant disruption to DocGo’s business, contributes to a general decrease in local, regional or global economic activity or otherwise impairs DocGo’s ability to meet customer demands, or if DocGo is not able to develop or execute on an adequate recovery plan in such circumstances, DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

DocGo’s ability to utilize its net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes may be limited.

As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, DocGo had aggregate federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $56.6 million and $76.8 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company had state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $67.2 million and $99.4 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, DocGo had approximately $202,965 and $41,515, respectively, of foreign net operating loss carryforwards. The federal net operating loss carryforwards generated after December 31, 2017, of approximately $62.2 million carry forward indefinitely, while the remaining federal net carryforwards of approximately $11.7 million begin to expire in 2037. State and foreign net operating loss carryforwards generated in the tax years from 2017 to 2020 will begin to expire, if not utilized, by 2039. DocGo’s unused losses generally carry forward to offset future taxable income, if any, until such unused losses expire. DocGo may be unable to use these losses to offset income before such unused losses expire. However, U.S. federal net operating losses generated in 2019 and forward are not subject to expiration and, if not utilized by fiscal 2021, are only available to offset 80% of taxable income each year due to changes in tax law attributable to the passage of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. In addition, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change” — generally defined as a greater than 50% cumulative change in the equity ownership of certain shareholders over a rolling three-year period — under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, DocGo’s ability to use its pre-change net operating loss carryforwards and other pre-change tax attributes to offset future taxable income or taxes may be limited. Although the Merger did not constitute such an ownership change, DocGo may experience ownership changes in the future as a result of changes in its stock ownership, some of which may not be within DocGo’s control, which could materially reduce or eliminate DocGo’s ability to use these losses or tax attributes to offset future taxable income or tax and have an adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Changes in tax laws or unanticipated tax liabilities could adversely affect DocGo’s effective income tax rate and profitability.

DocGo is subject to income taxes in the United States (federal and state) and various foreign jurisdictions. DocGo’s effective income tax rate could be adversely affected in the future by a number of factors, including changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, changes in tax laws and regulations or their interpretations and application, and the outcome of income tax audits in various jurisdictions around the world. In particular, the Biden administration has proposed increases to the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 21% to 28% and made other proposals. If any of these (or similar) proposals are ultimately enacted into law, in whole or in part, they could have a negative impact on our effective tax rate. We cannot predict the likelihood, timing or substance of U.S. tax proposals and will continue to monitor the progress of such proposals, as well as other global tax reform initiatives.

Changes in accounting rules, assumptions or judgments could materially and adversely affect DocGo.

Accounting rules and interpretations for certain aspects of DocGo’s financial reporting are highly complex and involve significant assumptions and judgment. These complexities could lead to a delay in the preparation and dissemination of DocGo’s financial statements. Furthermore, changes in accounting rules and interpretations or in DocGo’s accounting assumptions or judgments, such as asset impairments and contingencies, are likely to significantly impact its financial statements. In some cases, DocGo could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in restating financial statements from prior period(s). Any of these circumstances could have a material adverse effect on DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations. For additional information, see the financial statements of DocGo and related footnotes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

DocGo’s internal control over financial reporting may not be effective and its independent registered public accounting firm may not be able to certify as to their effectiveness, which could adversely affect DocGo’s business.

As a public company, DocGo is required to comply with the SEC’s rules implementing Sections 302 and 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which require management to certify financial and other information in its quarterly and annual reports and provide an annual management report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. DocGo is an emerging growth company and, as such, its independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to formally attest to the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 until the date DocGo is no longer an emerging growth company. At such time, DocGo’s independent registered public accounting firm may issue a report that is adverse in the event that it is not satisfied with the level at which DocGo’s controls are documented, designed or operating.

To comply with the requirements of being a public company, DocGo may need to undertake various actions, such as implementing additional internal controls and procedures and hiring additional accounting or internal audit staff. Testing and maintaining internal controls can divert management’s attention from other matters that are important to the operation of DocGo’s business. If DocGo identifies material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting or is unable to comply with the requirements of Section 404 or assert that its internal control over financial reporting is effective, or if DocGo’s independent registered public accounting firm is unable to express an opinion as to the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting when such disclosure is required, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of DocGo’s financial reports and the market price of its common stock could be negatively affected, and DocGo could become subject to investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities, any of which could have an adverse effect on DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

We identified material weaknesses in Motion’s internal control over financial reporting with respect to Motion’s previously issued financial statements. These material weaknesses could continue to adversely affect our ability to report our results of operations and financial condition accurately and in a timely manner.

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Management also evaluates the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls and we will disclose any changes and material weaknesses identified through such evaluation in those internal controls. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Prior to the Closing, Motion identified a material weakness in Motion’s internal control over financial reporting related to the classification of the Warrants as equity instead of liabilities. On May 10, 2021, the audit committee of Motion and management concluded that Motion’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2020, and, accordingly, the audit committee of Motion authorized management to restate Motion’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020, where Motion concluded that the control deficiency that resulted in the incorrect classification of Warrants constituted a material weakness as of December 31, 2020, resulting in the filing of Amendment No. 1 to Motion’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, filed with the SEC on May 28, 2021. This material weakness resulted in a material misstatement of Warrant liabilities, change in fair value of Warrant liabilities, additional paid-in capital, accumulated deficit and related financial disclosures as of and for the period from August 11 (inception) through December 31, 2020, as of September 30, 2020, for the three months ended September 30, 2020, and the period from August 11, 2020 (inception) through September 30, 2020.

Subsequent to filing of Amendment No. 1 to Motion’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, based on SEC guidance, we identified a material weakness in Motion’s internal control over financial reporting related to the Motion’s application of ASC 480-10-S99-3A to its accounting classification of the Motion Class A Common Stock. On November 22, 2021, our audit committee and management concluded that Motion’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2020, and, accordingly, our audit committee authorized management to restate Motion’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020, where we concluded that the control deficiency that resulted in the incorrect classification of Motion Class A Common Stock constituted a material weakness as of December 31, 2020, resulting in the filing of Amendment No. 2 to Motion’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, filed with the SEC on November 23, 2021. Historically, a portion of the Public Shares was classified as permanent equity to maintain stockholders’ equity greater than $5 million on the basis that Motion would not redeem its Motion Class A Common Stock in an amount that would cause its net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001, as described in the amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Motion. Pursuant to the Company’s re-evaluation of Motion’s application of ASC 480-10-S99-3A to its accounting classification of the Motion Class A Common Stock, the Company’s management has determined that the Motion Class A Common Stock include certain provisions that require classification of all of the Motion Class A Common Stock as temporary equity regardless of the net tangible assets redemption limitation contained in the amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Motion. For a discussion of management’s consideration of the material weakness identified related to the Company’s application of ASC 480-10-S99-3A to its accounting classification of the Public Share, see “Note 2” to Motion’s financial statements included in this prospectus.

We have implemented a remediation plan to remediate these material weakness surrounding Motion’s historical presentation of our Warrants and Motion Class A Common Stock but can give no assurance that the measures we have taken will prevent any future material weaknesses or deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting. Even though we have strengthened controls and procedures, in the future those controls and procedures may not be adequate to prevent or identify irregularities or errors or to facilitate the fair presentation of our financial statements.

We may face litigation and other risks as a result of the material weakness in Motion’s internal control over financial reporting.

As a result of such material weakness, the restatements, the change in accounting for the Warrants, the change in the classification of all of the Motion Class A Common Stock as temporary equity, and other matters raised or that may in the future be raised by the SEC, we face potential for litigation or other disputes which may include, among others, claims invoking the federal and state securities laws, contractual claims or other claims arising from the restatement and material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements. As of the date of this prospectus, we have no knowledge of any such litigation or dispute. However, we can provide no assurance that such litigation or dispute will not arise in the future. Any such litigation or dispute, whether successful or not, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

Risks Related to Healthcare Regulation

DocGo conducts business in a heavily regulated industry and any failure to comply with these laws and government regulations could require DocGo to make significant changes to its operations and could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The U.S. healthcare industry is heavily regulated and closely scrutinized by federal and state governments. Comprehensive statutes and regulations govern the manner in which DocGo provides and bills for its services and collects reimbursement from governmental programs and private payors, its relationship with its providers, vendors and clients, its marketing activities and other aspects of its operations. Of particular importance are:

DocGo’s ability to provide its services internationally is subject to the similar laws and regulations in those jurisdictions and the interpretation of these laws is evolving and varies significantly from country to county. As in the United States, many of these laws and regulations are enforced by governmental, judicial and regulatory authorities with broad discretion. Although similar to their U.S. counterparts in the subject matters addressed, these foreign laws may be very different in what is required of the business and how they regulate the underlying activities. DocGo cannot be certain that its interpretation of such laws and regulations are correct in how its structures its operations, its arrangements with its healthcare provider partners, services agreements and customer arrangements.

Many of these laws and regulations are complex, broad in scope and have few or narrowly structured exceptions and safe harbors. Often DocGo is required to fit certain activities within one of the statutory exceptions and safe harbors available and it is possible that some of DocGo’s current or future business activities could be subject to challenge under one or more of such laws. Achieving and sustaining compliance with these laws can be time-consuming, requires the commitment of significant resources and may prove costly. The risk of DocGo being found in violation of these laws and regulations is increased by the fact that many of these laws and regulations have not been fully interpreted by the regulatory authorities or the courts, and their provisions are sometimes open to a variety of interpretations. DocGo’s failure to accurately anticipate the application of these laws and regulations to its current or future business or any other failure or alleged failure to comply with legal or regulatory requirements could create liability for DocGo and negatively affect its business. Any action against DocGo for violation of these laws or regulations, even if DocGo successfully defends against it, could cause DocGo to incur significant legal expenses, divert management’s attention from the operation of the business and result in adverse publicity.

Enforcement officials have a number of mechanisms to combat regulatory compliance, fraud and abuse, and if DocGo fails to comply with applicable laws and regulations, it could suffer civil or criminal penalties, including fines, damages, recoupment of overpayments, loss of licenses needed to operate, loss of enrollment status and approvals necessary to participate in Medicare, Medicaid and other government and private third-party healthcare and payor programs, and exclusion from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other government healthcare programs. Investors, officers and managing employees associated with entities found to have committed healthcare fraud may also be excluded from participation in government healthcare programs. In addition, because of the potential for large monetary exposure, criminal liability and negative publicity, healthcare providers often resolve allegations without admissions of liability for significant and material amounts to avoid the uncertainty of damages that may be awarded in litigation proceedings. Such settlements often contain additional compliance and reporting requirements as part of a consent decree, settlement agreement or corporate integrity agreement.

DocGo believes that its business operations materially comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations. However, some of the healthcare laws and regulations applicable to DocGo are subject to limited or evolving interpretations, and a review of DocGo’s business or operations by a court, law enforcement or a regulatory authority might result in a determination of non-compliance. Any failure to comply with applicable legal and regulatory requirements and the consequences of such non-compliance, including those discussed above, could have a material adverse effect on DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

DocGo is required to comply with laws governing the transmission, security and privacy of health information.

Numerous state and federal laws and regulations govern the collection, dissemination, use, privacy, confidentiality, security, availability, integrity and other processing of PHI and PII, including HIPAA. HIPAA establishes a set of national privacy and security standards for the protection of PHI by health plans, healthcare clearinghouses and certain healthcare providers, referred to as “covered entities,” and the business associates with whom such covered entities contract for services. HIPAA requires covered entities such as DocGo and their business associates to develop and maintain policies and procedures with respect to PHI that is used or disclosed, including the adoption of administrative, physical and technical safeguards to protect this information. HIPAA also implemented the use of standard transaction code sets and standard identifiers that covered entities must use when submitting or receiving certain electronic healthcare transactions, including activities associated with the billing and collection of healthcare claims.

HIPAA also authorizes state attorneys general to file suit on behalf of their residents. Courts may award damages, costs and attorneys’ fees related to violations of HIPAA in these cases. While HIPAA does not create a private right of action allowing individuals to sue DocGo in civil court for violations of HIPAA, its standards have been used as the basis for duty of care in state civil suits such as those for negligence or recklessness in the misuse or breach of PHI. In addition, HIPAA mandates that the Secretary of HHS conduct periodic compliance audits of covered entities and business associates for compliance with the HIPAA privacy and security requirements. HIPAA also tasks HHS with establishing a methodology whereby harmed individuals who were the victims of breaches of unsecured PHI may receive a percentage of the fine paid by the violator under the Civil Monetary Penalties Law.

HIPAA further requires that patients be notified of any unauthorized acquisition, access, use or disclosure of their unsecured PHI that compromises the privacy or security of such information, with certain exceptions related to unintentional or inadvertent use or disclosure by employees or authorized individuals. HIPAA specifies that such notifications must be made “without unreasonable delay and in no case later than 60 calendar days after discovery of the breach.” If a breach affects 500 patients or more, it must be reported to HHS without unreasonable delay, and HHS will post the name of the breaching entity on its public web site. Breaches affecting 500 patients or more in the same state or jurisdiction must also be reported to the local media. If a breach involves fewer than 500 people, the covered entity must record it in a log and notify HHS at least annually.

In addition to HIPAA, numerous other federal and state laws and regulations protect the confidentiality, privacy, availability, integrity and security of PHI and other types of PII. State statutes and regulations vary from state to state, and these laws and regulations in many cases are more restrictive than, and may not be preempted by, HIPAA and its implementing rules. These laws and regulations are often uncertain, contradictory and subject to changed or differing interpretations, and DocGo expects new laws, rules and regulations regarding privacy, data protection and information security to be proposed and enacted in the future. In the event that new data security laws are implemented, DocGo may not be able to timely comply with such requirements, or such requirements may not be compatible with its current processes. Changing DocGo’s processes could be time-consuming and expensive, and failure to timely implement required changes could subject DocGo to liability for non-compliance. Some states may afford private rights of action to individuals who believe their PII has been misused. This complex, dynamic legal landscape regarding privacy, data protection and information security creates significant compliance issues for DocGo and potentially restricts its ability to collect, use and disclose data and can expose it to additional expense, adverse publicity and liability.

There is ongoing concern from privacy advocates, regulators and others regarding data protection and privacy issues, and the number of jurisdictions with data protection and privacy laws has been increasing. In addition, the scope of protection afforded to data subjects by many of these data protection and privacy laws has been increasing. There are also ongoing public policy discussions regarding whether the standards for deidentified, anonymous or pseudonymized health information are sufficient, and the risk of re-identification sufficiently small, to adequately protect patient privacy. These trends may lead to further restrictions on the use of this and similar categories of information. These initiatives or future initiatives could compromise DocGo’s ability to access and use data or to develop or market current or future services.

While DocGo has implemented data privacy and security measures in an effort to comply with applicable laws and regulations relating to privacy and data protection, some PHI and other PII or confidential information is transmitted to DocGo by third parties, who may not implement adequate security and privacy measures, and it is possible that laws, rules and regulations relating to privacy, data protection or information security may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with DocGo’s practices or those of third parties who transmit PHI and other PII or confidential information to it. Additionally, as a business associate under HIPAA, DocGo may also be liable for privacy and security breaches of PHI and certain similar failures of DocGo’s subcontractors. Even though DocGo contractually requires its subcontractors to safeguard protected health information as required by law, DocGo still has limited control over their actions and practices. If DocGo or these third parties are found to have violated such laws, rules or regulations, it could result in government-imposed fines, orders requiring that DocGo or these third parties change its or their practices, or criminal charges, which could adversely affect DocGo’s business. Complying with these various laws and regulations could cause DocGo to incur substantial costs or require it to change its business practices, systems and compliance procedures in a manner adverse to its business.

DocGo publishes statements to its patients and partners that describe how it handles and protects PHI. If federal or state regulatory authorities or private litigants consider any portion of these statements to be untrue, DocGo may be subject to claims of deceptive practices, which could lead to significant liabilities and consequences, including, without limitation, costs of responding to investigations, defending against litigation, settling claims and complying with regulatory or court orders.

DocGo also sends short message service, or SMS, text messages to potential end users who are eligible to use its service through certain customers and partners. While DocGo obtains consent from or on behalf of these individuals to send text messages, federal or state regulatory authorities or private litigants may claim that the notices and disclosures DocGo provides, form of consents it obtains or its SMS texting practices, are not adequate. These SMS texting campaigns are potential sources of risk for class action lawsuits and liability for DocGo. Numerous class action suits under federal and state laws have been filed in the past year against companies who conduct SMS texting programs, with many resulting in multimillion-dollar settlements to the plaintiffs. Any future such litigation against DocGo could be costly and time-consuming to defend.

Any failure to comply with HIPAA or similar laws and regulations and the consequences of such non-compliance could have a material adverse impact on DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

If DocGo does not effectively adapt to changes in the healthcare industry, including changes to laws and regulations regarding telehealth, DocGo’s business may be harmed.

The unpredictability of the healthcare regulatory landscape means that sudden changes in laws, rules, regulations and policy are possible. Federal, state and local legislative bodies frequently pass legislation and promulgate regulations that affect the healthcare industry. As has been the trend in the past decade with healthcare reform, it is reasonable to assume that there will continue to be increased government oversight and regulation of the healthcare industry in the future, particularly in times of changing political, regulatory and other influences. DocGo cannot provide any assurances regarding the ultimate content, timing or effect of any new healthcare legislation or regulations, nor is it possible at this time to estimate the impact of potential new legislation or regulations on its business. It is possible that future legislation enacted by Congress or state legislatures, or regulations promulgated by regulatory authorities at the federal or state level, could adversely affect DocGo’s current or future business. The extent to which a jurisdiction considers particular actions or relationships to comply with the applicable legal requirements is also subject to evolving interpretations by medical boards and state attorneys general, among others, each with broad discretion. It is possible that the changes to the Medicare, Medicaid or other governmental healthcare program reimbursements may serve as precedent to possible changes in other payors’ reimbursement policies in a manner adverse to DocGo. Similarly, changes in private payor reimbursements could lead to adverse changes in Medicare, Medicaid and other governmental healthcare programs.

As one example, the telehealth industry is still relatively young and DocGo’s ability to provide its telehealth solutions is directly dependent upon the development and interpretation of the laws governing remote healthcare, the practice of medicine and healthcare delivery in the applicable jurisdictions and more broadly. A few states have imposed different, and, in some cases, additional, standards regarding the provision of services via telehealth. State medical boards have also established new rules or interpreted existing rules in their respective states in a manner that has limited the way telehealth services can be provided. Although the COVID-19 pandemic has led to the relaxation of certain Medicare, Medicaid and state licensure restrictions on the delivery of telehealth services, it is uncertain how long the relaxed policies will remain in effect, and there can be no guarantee that once the COVID-19 pandemic subsides or ends that such restrictions will not be reinstated or changed in a way that adversely affects DocGo’s current or future telehealth offerings.

Accordingly, DocGo must monitor its compliance with law in every jurisdiction in which it operates, on an ongoing basis. While DocGo believes that it has structured its contracts and operations in material compliance with applicable healthcare laws and regulations, the healthcare laws and regulations applicable to DocGo may be amended or interpreted in new or different ways that are adverse to DocGo and new laws and regulations adverse to DocGo’s current or future business may be adopted in the future. There can be no assurance that DocGo will be able to successfully address changes in the current regulatory environment or new laws and regulations that may be implemented in the future, or that practices which are compliant now will continue to be so in the future. Any failure to comply with any changes to or new developments in the healthcare regulatory environment could have a material adverse effect on DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

DocGo must be properly enrolled in governmental healthcare programs before it can receive reimbursement for services, and there may be delays in the enrollment process.

Each time DocGo expands into a new market, whether organically or by way of acquisition, DocGo must enroll the new operations under DocGo’s applicable group identification number for Medicare and Medicaid programs and for certain managed care and private insurance programs before DocGo can receive reimbursement for services rendered to beneficiaries of those programs. The estimated time to receive approval for the enrollment is sometimes difficult to predict.

With respect to Medicare, providers can retrospectively bill Medicare for services provided 30 days prior to the effective date of the enrollment. In addition, the enrollment rules provide that the effective date of the enrollment will be the later of the date on which the enrollment application was filed and approved by the Medicare contractor, or the date on which the provider began providing services. If DocGo is unable to complete the enrollment process within the 30 days after the commencement of services, DocGo will be precluded from billing Medicare for any services which were provided to a Medicare beneficiary more than 30 days prior to the effective date of the enrollment. With respect to Medicaid, new enrollment rules and whether a state will allow providers to retrospectively bill Medicaid for services provided prior to submitting an enrollment application varies by state. Failure to timely enroll could reduce DocGo’s total revenues and have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition or results of operations.

The Affordable Care Act, as currently structured, added additional enrollment requirements for Medicare and Medicaid, which have been further enhanced through implementing regulations and increased enforcement scrutiny. Every enrolled provider must revalidate its enrollment at regular intervals and must update the Medicare contractors and many state Medicaid programs with significant changes on a timely basis. If DocGo fails to provide sufficient documentation as required to maintain its enrollment, Medicare and Medicaid could deny continued future enrollment or revoke DocGo’s enrollment and billing privileges.

The requirements for enrollment, licensure, certification and accreditation may include notification or approval in the event of a transfer or change of ownership or certain other changes. Other agencies or payors with which DocGo has contracts may have similar requirements, and some of these processes may be complex. Failure to provide required notifications or obtain necessary approvals may result in the delay or inability to complete an acquisition or transfer, loss of licensure, lapses in reimbursement or other penalties. While DocGo makes reasonable efforts to substantially comply with these requirements, it cannot assure you that the agencies that administer these programs or have awarded DocGo contracts will not find that DocGo has failed to comply in some material respects. A finding of non-compliance and any resulting payment delays, refund demands or other sanctions could have a material adverse effect on DocGo’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

Reductions in Medicare reimbursement rates or changes in the rules governing the Medicare program could have a material adverse effect on DocGo.

DocGo generates a significant amount of revenues from Medicare, either directly or through Medicare Advantage (“MA”) plans, particularly in its healthcare transportation segment. Medicare revenues represent approximately 22.4% and 6.4% of DocGo’s revenues for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2021, respectively. In addition, many private payors base their reimbursement rates on the published Medicare rates or are themselves reimbursed by Medicare for the services DocGo provides. As a result, DocGo’s results of operations are, in part, dependent on government funding levels for Medicare programs and any changes that limit or reduce MA or general Medicare reimbursement levels, such as reductions in or limitations of reimbursement amounts or rates under programs, reductions in funding of programs, expansion of benefits without adequate funding or elimination of coverage for certain benefits or for certain individuals, could have a material adverse effect on DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Medicare program and its reimbursement rates and rules are subject to frequent change. These include statutory and regulatory changes, rate adjustments (including retroactive adjustments), administrative or executive orders and government funding restrictions, all of which may materially adversely affect the rates at which Medicare reimburses DocGo for its services. Budget pressures often cause the federal government to reduce or place limits on reimbursement rates under Medicare. Implementation of these and other types of measures could result in substantial reductions in DocGo’s revenues and operating margins. For example, due to the federal sequestration, an automatic 2% reduction in Medicare spending took effect beginning in April 2013. The CARES Act, which was signed into law on March 27, 2020, designed to provide financial support and resources to individuals and businesses affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, temporarily suspended these reductions from May 1, 2020 through March 31, 2021, and extended the sequester by one year, through 2030.

Each year, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) issues a final rule to establish the MA benchmark payment rates for the following calendar year. Reductions to MA rates impacting DocGo may be greater than the industry average rate and the final impact of the MA rates can vary from any estimate DocGo may have. In addition, CMS may change the rules governing the Medicare program, including those governing reimbursement. Reductions in reimbursement rates or the scope of services being reimbursed could have a material adverse effect on DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

State and federal efforts to reduce Medicaid spending could adversely affect DocGo.

Certain of DocGo’s customers who are individuals are dual-eligible, meaning their coverage comes from both Medicare and Medicaid. As a result, a small portion of DocGo’s revenue comes from Medicaid, accounting for approximately 4.8% and 1.4% of revenue for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2021, respectively. Medicaid is a joint federal-state program purchasing healthcare services for the low income and indigent as well as certain higher income individuals with significant health needs. Under broad federal criteria, states establish rules for eligibility, services and payment. Medicaid is a state-administered program financed by both state funds and matching federal funds. Medicaid spending has increased rapidly in recent years, becoming a significant component of state budgets. This, combined with slower state revenue growth, has led both the federal government and many states to institute measures aimed at controlling the growth of Medicaid spending, and in some instances reducing aggregate Medicaid spending.

For example, a number of states have adopted or are considering legislation designed to reduce their Medicaid expenditures, such as financial arrangements commonly referred to as provider taxes. Under provider tax arrangements, states collect taxes from healthcare providers and then use the revenue to pay the providers as a Medicaid expenditure, which allows the states to then claim additional federal matching funds on the additional reimbursements. Current federal law provides for a cap on the maximum allowable provider tax as a percentage of the provider’s total revenue. There can be no assurance that federal law will continue to provide matching federal funds on state Medicaid expenditures funded through provider taxes, or that the current caps on provider taxes will not be reduced. Any discontinuance or reduction in federal matching of provider tax-related Medicaid expenditures could have a significant and adverse effect on states’ Medicaid expenditures, and as a result could have an adverse effect on DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Also, as part of the movement to repeal, replace or modify the Health Care Reform Law and as a means to reduce the federal budget deficit, there are renewed congressional efforts to move Medicaid from an open-ended program with coverage and benefits set by the federal government to one in which states receive a fixed amount of federal funds, either through block grants or per capita caps, and have more flexibility to determine benefits, eligibility or provider payments. If those changes are implemented, DocGo cannot predict whether the amount of fixed federal funding to the states will be based on current payment amounts, or if it will be based on lower payment amounts, which would negatively impact those states that expanded their Medicaid programs in response to the Health Care Reform Law.

DocGo expects these state and federal efforts to continue for the foreseeable future. The Medicaid program and its reimbursement rates and rules are subject to frequent change at both the federal and state level. These include statutory and regulatory changes, rate adjustments (including retroactive adjustments), administrative or executive orders and government funding restrictions, all of which may materially adversely affect the rates at which DocGo’s services are reimbursed by state Medicaid plans.

DocGo has been and could become the subject of federal and state investigations and compliance reviews.

Companies in the broader healthcare industry are subject to a high level of scrutiny by various governmental agencies and their agents. Both federal and state government agencies have heightened and coordinated civil and criminal enforcement efforts as part of numerous ongoing investigations of healthcare companies, as well as their executives and managers. These investigations relate to a wide variety of topics, including referral and billing practices. For example, to enforce compliance with the federal laws, DOJ and the OIG have established national enforcement initiatives that focus on specific billing practices or other suspected areas of abuse. Given the significant size of actual and potential settlements, it is expected that the government will continue to devote substantial resources to investigating healthcare providers’ compliance, including compliance with the healthcare reimbursement rules and fraud and abuse laws. DocGo is also required to conduct periodic internal audits in connection with its third-party relationships and receives repayment demands from third-party payors based on allegations that its services were not medically necessary, were billed at an improper level or otherwise violated applicable billing requirements that require investigation. Further, DocGo periodically conducts internal reviews of its regulatory compliance. Although to date none historically have, an investigation or audit of DocGo, its executives or its managers, whether by the government and its agents, a third-party or DocGo itself, could result in significant expense to the company, adverse publicity and divert management’s attention from DocGo’s business, regardless of the outcome, and could result in significant fines, penalties and other sanctions, any of which could have a material adverse effect on DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

DocGo’s business practices may be found to constitute illegal fee-splitting or corporate practice of medicine, which may lead to penalties and could adversely affect DocGo’s business.

Many states have laws that prohibit business corporations such as DocGo from practicing medicine, employing physicians, exercising control over medical judgments or decisions of physicians or other health care professionals (such as EMTs and nurses), or engaging in certain business arrangements such as fee-splitting, with each of the foregoing activities collectively referred to as the “corporate practice of medicine.” In some states these prohibitions are expressly stated in a statute or regulation, while in other states the prohibition is a matter of judicial or regulatory interpretation. Many of the states in which DocGo currently operates generally prohibit the corporate practice of medicine, and other states may as well, including those into which DocGo may expand in the future.

The state laws and regulations and administrative and judicial decisions that enumerate the specific corporate practice of medicine rules vary considerably from state to state and have been subject to limited judicial or regulatory interpretations. These laws and regulations are enforced by both the courts and government agencies, each with broad discretion. Courts, government agencies or other parties, including physicians, may assert that DocGo is engaged in the unlawful corporate practice of medicine. While penalties for violations of the corporate practice of medicine vary from state to state, as a result of such allegations, DocGo could be subject to civil and criminal penalties, its contracts could be found legally invalid and unenforceable, in whole or in part, or DocGo could be required to restructure its contractual arrangements entirely. If found to be engaged in the corporate practice of medicine, DocGo may not be able to restructure its operations or its contractual arrangements on favorable terms or at all. Any failure to comply with these laws and regulations regarding the corporate practice of medicine and the consequences of such non-compliance could have a material adverse impact on DocGo’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

DocGo believes its business is structured to comply with the applicable regulations governing fee-splitting and the corporate practice of medicine in the states where it generates revenue; however, in many cases and as noted above, these laws and regulations applicable to DocGo are subject to limited or evolving interpretations, and there can be no assurances that a review of DocGo’s business or operations by a court, law enforcement or a regulatory authority might result in a determination of non-compliance.

Additional Risks Relating to Ownership of Common Stock and Warrants

Nasdaq may delist DocGo’s securities from trading on its exchange, which could limit investors’ ability to make transactions in its securities and subject DocGo to additional trading restrictions.

Common Stock and Public Warrants are listed on Nasdaq under the symbols “DCGO” and “DCGOW,” respectively. DocGo will be required to meet continued listing requirements for its securities to continue to be listed on Nasdaq, including having a minimum number of public securities holders and a minimum stock price. We cannot assure you that DocGo will continue to meet those listing requirements in the future.

If Nasdaq delists DocGo’s securities from trading on its exchange and DocGo is not able to list its securities on another national securities exchange, we expect our securities could be quoted on an over-the-counter market. If this were to occur, we could face significant material adverse consequences, including:

The National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996, which is a federal statute, prevents or preempts the states from regulating the sale of certain securities, which are referred to as “covered securities.” Since Common Stock and Public Warrants are listed on Nasdaq, they are covered securities. Although the states are preempted from regulating the sale of covered securities, the federal statute does allow the states to investigate companies if there is a suspicion of fraud, and if there is a finding of fraudulent activity, the states can regulate or bar the sale of covered securities in a particular case. While DocGo is not aware of a state having used these powers to prohibit or restrict the sale of securities issued by blank check companies, other than the State of Idaho, certain state securities regulators view blank check companies unfavorably and might use these powers, or threaten to use these powers, to hinder the sale of securities of blank check companies in their states. Further, if DocGo was no longer listed on Nasdaq, its securities would not be covered securities and it would be subject to regulation in each state in which it offers its securities.

An active, liquid trading market for our securities may not develop, which may limit your ability to sell your securities.

An active trading market for our securities may never develop or be sustained. A public trading market having the desirable characteristics of depth, liquidity and orderliness depends upon the existence of willing buyers and sellers at any given time, such existence being dependent upon the individual decisions of buyers and sellers over which neither we nor any market maker has control. The failure of an active and liquid trading market to develop and continue would likely have a material adverse effect on the value of our Common Stock and Warrants. An inactive market may also impair our ability to raise capital to continue to fund operations by issuing securities and may impair our ability to acquire other companies or technologies by using our securities as consideration.

Because there are no current plans to pay cash dividends on Common Stock for the foreseeable future, you may not receive any return on investment unless you sell your Common Stock for a price greater than that which you paid for it.

DocGo intends to retain future earnings, if any, for future operations, expansion and debt repayment and there are no current plans to pay any cash dividends for the foreseeable future. The declaration, amount and payment of any future dividends on shares of Common Stock will be at the sole discretion of DocGo’s board of directors. DocGo’s board of directors may take into account general and economic conditions, DocGo’s financial condition and results of operations, DocGo’s available cash and current and anticipated cash needs, capital requirements, contractual, legal, tax, and regulatory restrictions, implications on the payment of dividends by DocGo to its stockholders or by its subsidiaries to it and such other factors as DocGo’s board of directors may deem relevant. In addition, DocGo’s ability to pay dividends is limited by covenants of DocGo’s existing and outstanding indebtedness and may be limited by covenants of any future indebtedness DocGo incurs. As a result, you may not receive any return on an investment in Common Stock unless you sell Common Stock for a price greater than that which you paid for it.

If securities analysts do not publish research or reports about DocGo’s business or if they downgrade the Common Stock or DocGo’s sector, DocGo’s stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for Common Stock will rely in part on the research and reports that industry or financial analysts publish about DocGo or its business. DocGo will not control these analysts. In addition, some financial analysts may have limited expertise with DocGo’s model and operations. Furthermore, if one or more of the analysts who do cover DocGo downgrade its stock or industry, or the stock of any of its competitors, or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about its business, the price of Common Stock could decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of DocGo or fail to publish reports on it regularly, DocGo could lose visibility in the market, which in turn could cause its stock price or trading volume to decline.

Future sales, or the perception of future sales, by DocGo or its stockholders in the public market could cause the market price for Common Stock to decline.

The sale of shares of Common Stock in the public market, or the perception that such sales could occur, could harm the prevailing market price of shares of Common Stock. These sales, or the possibility that these sales may occur, also might make it more difficult for DocGo to sell equity securities in the future at a time and at a price that it deems appropriate.

Certain holders of our Common Stock and Warrants have entered into the lock-up and escrow agreements in connection with the Business Combination. The counterparties to these agreements may, in certain instances, without notice, release all or any portion of the securities subject to these lock-up and escrow agreements. See the section entitled “Securities Eligible for Future Sale” for a description of these lock-up and escrow agreements. Upon the expiration or waiver of the lock-ups and escrows described above, shares held by the Sponsor and certain other stockholders of DocGo will be eligible for resale, subject to volume, manner of sale and other limitations under Rule 144, when such rule becomes applicable to DocGo. In addition, pursuant to the A&R Registration Rights Agreement, the New Holders, Sponsor, and certain other stockholders have the right, subject to certain conditions, to require DocGo to register the sale of their shares of Common Stock under the Securities Act. By exercising their registration rights and selling a large number of shares, these stockholders could cause the prevailing market price of Common Stock to decline. The shares covered by the A&R Registration Rights Agreement represent approximately 15.7% of outstanding Common Stock.

As restrictions on resale end or if these stockholders exercise their registration rights, the market price of shares of Common Stock could drop significantly if the holders of these shares sell them or are perceived by the market as intending to sell them. These factors could also make it more difficult for DocGo to raise additional funds through future offerings of DocGo’s shares of Common Stock or other securities.

DocGo currently has an aggregate of 6,366,638 Warrants outstanding, which became exercisable on December 5, 2021, provided that there is an effective registration statement under the Securities Act covering the shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants and a current prospectus relating to them is available. DocGo has agreed to use reasonable best efforts to file such registration statement within 15 business days and have it declared effective within 60 business days after the consummation of the Transactions. The issuance of shares of Common Stock upon the exercise of Warrants could result in dilution to DocGo’s stockholders.

In addition, the shares of Common Stock reserved for future issuance under DocGo’s equity incentive plans will become eligible for sale in the public market once those shares are issued, subject to provisions relating to various vesting agreements, lock-up agreements and, in some cases, limitations on volume and manner of sale applicable to affiliates under Rule 144, as applicable. The number of shares of Common Stock reserved for future issuance under its equity incentive plans, including Substitute Options, represents approximately 24.5% of outstanding Common Stock. The compensation committee of DocGo’s board of directors may determine the exact number of shares to be reserved for future issuance under its equity incentive plans at its discretion. DocGo has filed a Form S-8 under the Securities Act to register shares of Common Stock and securities convertible into or exchangeable for shares of Common Stock issued pursuant to DocGo’s equity incentive plan, and may file additional registration statements on Form S-8 in the future. Any such Form S-8 registration statements will automatically become effective upon filing. Accordingly, shares registered under such registration statements will be available for sale in the open market.

In the future, DocGo may also issue its securities in connection with investments or acquisitions. The amount of shares of Common Stock issued in connection with an investment or acquisition could constitute a material portion of DocGo’s then-outstanding shares of Common Stock. Any issuance of additional securities in connection with investments or acquisitions may result in additional dilution to DocGo’s stockholders.

Anti-takeover provisions in DocGo’s organizational documents could delay or prevent a change of control.

Certain provisions of the Charter and the Bylaws may have an anti-takeover effect and may delay, defer or prevent a merger, acquisition, tender offer, takeover attempt or other change of control transaction that a stockholder might consider in its best interest, including those attempts that might result in a premium over the market price for the shares held by DocGo’s stockholders.

These provisions provide for, among other things:

These anti-takeover provisions could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire DocGo, even if the third party’s offer may be considered beneficial by many of DocGo’s stockholders. As a result, DocGo’s stockholders may be limited in their ability to obtain a premium for their shares. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and other stockholders to elect directors of your choosing and to cause DocGo to take other corporate actions you desire. See “Description of Securities.”

The Charter designates the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by stockholders, which could limit stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with DocGo or its directors, officers, employees or stockholders.

The Charter provides that, unless DocGo, in writing, selects or consents to the selection of an alternative forum: (a) the sole and exclusive forum for any complaint asserting any internal corporate claims (as defined below), to the fullest extent permitted by law, and subject to applicable jurisdictional requirements, is the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (or, if the Court of Chancery does not have, or declines to accept, jurisdiction, another state court or a federal court located within the State of Delaware) and (b) the sole and exclusive forum for any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall be the federal district courts of the United States of America; provided however, these provisions will not apply to suits brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Exchange Act. For purposes of this provision, internal corporate claims mean claims, including claims in the right of the Corporation that are based upon a violation of a duty by a current or former director, officer, employee or stockholder in such capacity, or as to which the DGCL confers jurisdiction upon the Court of Chancery. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring or holding any interest in shares of stock of the Corporation shall be deemed to have notice of and consented to the provisions of this Article.

As a result, (1) derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of DocGo, (2) action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer, stockholder or employee to DocGo or its stockholders, (3) action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL or the Charter or the Bylaws, or (4) action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be exclusively brought in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (or, if the Court of Chancery does not have, or declines to accept, jurisdiction, another state court or a federal court located within the State of Delaware). Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of DocGo’s capital stock shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to the provisions of the Charter described above. This choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with DocGo or its directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against DocGo and its directors, officers and employees. Alternatively, if a court were to find these provisions of the Charter inapplicable to, or unenforceable in respect of, one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, DocGo may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect DocGo’s business and financial condition.

The Charter provides that the exclusive forum provision is applicable to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, subject to certain exceptions. Section 27 of the Exchange Act creates exclusive federal jurisdiction over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. As a result, the exclusive forum provision does not apply to suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction.

Certain of stockholders, including the Sponsor, may engage in business activities which compete with DocGo or otherwise conflict with DocGo’s interests.

The Sponsor and its affiliates are in the business of making investments in companies and may from time to time acquire and hold interests in businesses that compete directly or indirectly with DocGo. The Charter provides that none of the Sponsor, any of its affiliates or any director who is not employed by DocGo (including any non-employee director who serves as one of DocGo’s officers in both his director and officer capacities) or his or her affiliates will have any duty to refrain from engaging, directly or indirectly, in the same business activities or similar business activities or lines of business in which DocGo operates. The Sponsor also may pursue acquisition opportunities that may be complementary to DocGo’s business and, as a result, those acquisition opportunities may not be available to DocGo.

DocGo may redeem your unexpired Warrants prior to their exercise at a time that is disadvantageous to you, thereby making your Warrants worthless.

DocGo has the ability to redeem outstanding Warrants at any time after they become exercisable and prior to their expiration, at a price of $0.01 per Warrant, provided that the last reported sales price of Common Stock equals or exceeds $18.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) on the trading day prior to the date on which we send the notice of redemption to the Warrant holders. If and when the Warrants become redeemable by DocGo, DocGo may not exercise its redemption right if the issuance of shares of Common Stock upon exercise of the Warrants is not exempt from registration or qualification under applicable state blue sky laws or it is unable to effect such registration or qualification. DocGo will use its best efforts to register or qualify such shares of Common Stock under the blue sky laws of the state of residence in those states in which the Warrants were offered. Redemption of the outstanding Warrants could force you (i) to exercise your Warrants and pay the exercise price therefor at a time when it may be disadvantageous for you to do so, (ii) to sell your Warrants at the then-current market price when you might otherwise wish to hold your Warrants or (iii) to accept the nominal redemption price which, at the time the outstanding Warrants are called for redemption, is likely to be substantially less than the market value of your Warrants. None of the Private Warrants will be redeemable by DocGo so long as they are held by the Sponsor, or its permitted transferees.

Warrants are exercisable for Common Stock, which would increase the number of shares eligible for future resale in the public market and result in dilution to our stockholders.

DocGo currently has an aggregate of 6,366,638 Warrants outstanding, representing the right to purchase an equivalent amount shares of Common Stock. The Warrants became exercisable on December 5, 2021. The exercise price of the Warrants is $11.50 per share. To the extent such Warrants are exercised, additional shares of Common Stock will be issued, which would result in dilution to our stockholders and increase the number of shares eligible for resale in the public market. Sales of substantial numbers of such shares in the public market or the fact that such Warrants may be exercised could adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock. However, there is no guarantee that the Warrants will ever be in the money prior to their expiration, and as such, the Warrants may expire worthless.

The Warrants may never be in the money, and they may expire worthless and the terms of the Warrants may be amended in a manner adverse to a holder if holders of at least 50% of the then-outstanding Warrants approve of such amendment.

The Warrant Agreement provides that the terms of the Warrants may be amended without the consent of any holder to cure any ambiguity or correct any defective provision, but requires the approval by the holders of at least 50% of the then-outstanding Warrants to make any change that adversely affects the interests of the registered holders of the Warrants. Accordingly, we may amend the terms of the Warrants in a manner adverse to a holder if holders of at least 50% of the then-outstanding Public Warrants approve such amendment. Although our ability to amend the terms of the Warrants with the consent of at least 50% of the then-outstanding Public Warrants is unlimited, examples of such amendments could be amendments to, among other things, increase the exercise price of the Warrants, shorten the exercise period or decrease the number of Common Stock purchasable upon exercise of a Warrant.

The market price and trading volume of Common Stock and Warrants may be volatile.

Stock markets, including Nasdaq, have from time-to-time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. Even if an active, liquid and orderly trading market develops and is sustained for Common Stock and Warrants, the market price of Common Stock and Warrants may be volatile and could decline significantly, whether or not any price changes are related to matters specific to DocGo. In addition, the trading volume in Common Stock and Warrants may fluctuate and cause significant price variations to occur. If the market price of Common Stock and Warrants declines significantly, you may be unable to resell your shares of Common Stock and Warrants at or above the market price of Common Stock and Warrants. We cannot assure you that the market price of Common Stock and Warrants will not fluctuate widely or decline significantly in the future in response to a number of factors, including, among others, the following:

In the past, securities class-action litigation has often been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in the market price of their securities. This type of litigation could result in substantial costs and divert DocGo’s management’s attention and resources, which could have a material adverse effect on DocGo.

Future issuances of debt securities and equity securities may adversely affect DocGo, including the market price of Common Stock and may be dilutive to existing stockholders.

There is no assurance that DocGo will not incur debt or issue equity ranking senior to Common Stock. Those securities will generally have priority upon liquidation. Such securities also may be governed by an indenture or other instrument containing covenants restricting its operating flexibility. Additionally, any convertible or exchangeable securities that DocGo issues in the future may have rights, preferences and privileges more favorable than those of Common Stock. Separately, additional financing may not be available on favorable terms, or at all. Because DocGo’s decision to issue debt or equity in the future will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond DocGo’s control, it cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing, nature or success of DocGo’s future capital raising efforts. As a result, future capital raising efforts may reduce the market price of Common Stock and be dilutive to existing stockholders.

The JOBS Act permits “emerging growth companies” like us to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies.

DocGo qualifies as an “emerging growth company” as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Securities Act, as modified by the JOBS Act. As such, we take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies for as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, including (i) the exemption from the auditor attestation requirements with respect to internal control over financial reporting under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, (ii) the exemptions from say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and say-on-golden parachute voting requirements and (iii) reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements. As a result, our stockholders may not have access to certain information they deem important. We will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of (i) the last day of the fiscal year (a) following the fifth anniversary of our Initial Public Offering, (b) in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.07 billion or (c) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of the Common Stock and Warrants that are held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our prior second fiscal quarter, and (ii) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three-year period.

In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act also provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of the exemption from complying with new or revised accounting standards provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act as long as we are an emerging growth company. An emerging growth company can therefore delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies, but any such election to opt out is irrevocable. We have elected to avail ourselves of such extended transition period, which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, we, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard. This may make comparison of our financial statements with another public company that is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company that has opted out of using the extended transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used.

We cannot predict if investors will find the Common Stock and Warrants of DocGo less attractive because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find the Common Stock and Warrants less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for the Common Stock, and Warrants and more stock price volatility.