Bitcoiner PlanB slams ETH: ‘Centralized & premined’ shitcoin
2025年4月21日 - 11:57PM
Cointelegraph


Pseudonymous Bitcoin stock-to-flow (S2F) model creator PlanB
attacked Ethereum and mocked the project’s co-founder, Vitalik
Buterin.
PlanB mockingly reposted a June 2022 X post by Buterin in which
the Ethereum co-founder said S2F “is really not looking good now.”
PlanB responded with a new posting stating, “Ethereum is really not
looking good now.”
Source: PlanB
In his response to Buterin’s criticism from years ago, PlanB
claimed Ethereum and the network’s coin, Ether
(ETH), are centralized
and premined, pointing to its shift to proof-of-stake (PoS) and
changes in its issuance rate. He said that those features “are
harmful and deserve all the mockery they get,” echoing Buterin’s
old comment about S2F.
Related:
Bitcoin analyst PlanB transfers Bitcoin to ETFs to
avoid 'hassle with keys'
PlanB’s criticism of Ethereum
In a separate X post,
PlanB explained that an Ethereum full node requires nine terabytes
of disk space, meaning he “can not run it” on his hardware. The
kind of node in question is probably an Ethereum archival node,
which, according to
Etherscan data, requires over 21.8 terabytes (TB) with the Geth
client.
An Ethereum full node running the Geth client that prunes older
states with the default settings requires 1.28 TB,
according to
Etherscan data. The Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum communities have long debated what
constitutes a full node.
This type of pruned node cannot access the full historical data
or generate Merkle proofs for old blocks, which limits its research
and bug-finding applications. Still, such nodes can engage in full
trustless block and transaction validation.
Bitcoin’s full nodes require under 700 gigabytes (0.7
terabytes),
according to Statista data, and also require much less
computing power. This means that users can run Bitcoin full nodes
much more easily, leading to a higher node count and higher network
decentralization.
Not everyone views the criticism as founded. Jeremiah O’Connor,
chief technology officer and co-founder at crypto cybersecurity
firm Trugard, told Cointelegraph:
“PlanB’s take is classic Bitcoin maxi energy — loud,
confident and missing half the picture.“
O’Connor explained that Ethereum and Bitcoin serve two different
purposes. He said that “Ethereum nodes are bigger and more complex”
since Ether “isn’t just digital gold — it’s a full-on global
computer.”
“Of course it’s heavier.“
He conceded that users relying on centralized data providers
like Infura is a problem. Still, he claimed that every ecosystem
engages in centralization tradeoffs and that Ethereum developers
are working to address the issue, and “it’s evolving fast.”
“Calling ETH a “shitcoin” because it’s not Bitcoin is like
calling smartphones a scam because they aren’t landlines,“ he
said.
He added that the two are different tools with differing
purposes. He views Bitcoin as a “rock-solid value storage” and
Ethereum as “where the builders are,” and said that “both matter”
and “complement each other.”
Related:
Can the Ethereum blockchain roll back transactions?
Understanding the limits and risks
Buterin as a “single point of failure”
PlanB also questioned Buterin’s influence on Ethereum’s
development, calling him a “single point of failure.” However,
Ethereum Foundation co-executive director Tomasz Stańczak recently
announced that Buterin is stepping back from day-to-day
operations to focus on research.
PlanB also raised an issue with Ethereum rolling
back transactions following the 2016 DAO hack:
“The fact that this is even possible should worry
you.“
Bybit CEO Ben Zhou suggested an Ethereum rollback following the
exchange’s $1.4 billion hack. Still, many in the community argued
that a rollback happening now, with Ethereum being a more mature
network, would be next to impossible.
Bitcoin itself had a comparable incident in its early history as
well. On Aug. 15, 2010, an exploit resulted in a transaction that
minted 184 BTC
on the network in block 74638.
Satoshi Nakamoto (still involved in development at the time) and
other core developers released an update that rolled back the
network to block 74637 and patched the vulnerability. In other
words, Bitcoin saw its own blockchain rollback in its early
days.
Other points raised by PlanB include Ethereum switching to PoS,
which he claims has consequences for the price. He suggested that
changes to issuance and governance undermine Ethereum’s value
proposition compared to Bitcoin’s fixed and predictable supply.
Magazine:
Crypto ‘more taboo than OnlyFans,’ says Violetta
Zironi, who sold song for 1 BTC
...
Continue reading Bitcoiner PlanB slams ETH:
‘Centralized & premined’ shitcoin
The post
Bitcoiner PlanB slams ETH: ‘Centralized &
premined’ shitcoin appeared first on
CoinTelegraph.
Bitcoin (COIN:BTCUSD)
過去 株価チャート
から 4 2025 まで 5 2025
Bitcoin (COIN:BTCUSD)
過去 株価チャート
から 5 2024 まで 5 2025